An expert discusses the political landscape around PiS and the local elections. The core idea is that the ruling party should project a positive, program-driven image to counteract early discouragement among voters. A credible, forward-looking platform is seen as crucial, especially after recent campaign missteps that focused heavily on threatening the opponent. The emphasis is on building a constructive program that highlights concrete investments and development plans rather than negative campaigning.
Readers are reminded of recent polling and research on local election expectations. A study conducted for Wirtualna Polska shows a split among respondents about who might win; some forecasts favor KO, others PiS. Observers note that party officials view these polls as a test of momentum and messaging, and they consider how best to appeal to undecided voters while maintaining support among core supporters.
The discussion points to a number of strategic questions.1 First, the bandwagon effect is mentioned as a key factor influencing undecided voters, who often align with the perceived frontrunner. The path forward for PiS is described as rebuilding credibility by presenting a clear local government program. The plan would prioritize investments that the national administration has signaled it will suspend, including energy projects, strategic infrastructure, and environmental initiatives such as water treatment facilities. In addition, the party’s credibility hinges on the ability to demonstrate progress on the “100 specific items” promised at the national level, while addressing concerns about tax relief and other Poland-wide issues.
The strategy also calls for targeting groups that have historically supported PiS, as well as potential new supporters from conservative urban centers. The aim is to broaden the party’s appeal beyond its traditional base by engaging younger candidates with center-right views who can resonate with a broader audience, all while maintaining consistency with national-level messaging. In this regard, candidates for mayor in large cities are seen as a long-term investment in PiS’s image and political durability, even if immediate wins are not guaranteed.
There is acknowledgment that PiS does not currently hold power in any city with populations over 100,000, making some traditional targets challenging. Yet, the discussion frames these contests as strategic opportunities to refresh PiS’s public image and lay groundwork for future victories. A generational shift is proposed as part of a long-term plan, with the understanding that some veteran politicians may not secure re-election. If the party’s image needs a refresh, younger faces can help, even if they do not win every race this cycle.
Several external pressures are noted as complicating the political environment. European Union policies and climate-related regulations are cited as elements that complicate governance in Poland. The dialogue suggests that public perception of EU actions can influence domestic support, especially when combined with debates over local implementations and funding. The discussion also touches on the debate around the EU Commissioner involved in agriculture and climate policies, clarifying that a single official is not responsible for broader EU deals or the Green Deal itself. The focus remains on how these topics intersect with national policy and local voter concerns.
In this context, the need for a positive, open approach becomes clear. The argument is that a constructive, transparent stance will help PiS address voter skepticism and the fatigue that comes with ongoing bureaucratic tensions. The overarching message is to emphasize a future-oriented, programmatic agenda that aligns with local needs and European realities. The idea is to limit losses in key regions and maintain influence in several provincial assemblies by presenting a credible, well-communicated plan for development and governance. This approach aims to prevent a slide in support and to signal readiness to govern responsibly at the local level, while preparing ground for more competitive races in the next cycle.
When discussing the party’s strategic direction, commentators stress that the focus should not be solely on defending or contesting individual political figures. Instead, the emphasis should be on a broader, positive narrative that resonates with younger voters, professionals, and residents in mid-sized cities. The line of argument suggests defending core party values while expanding the conversation to include practical, locally relevant issues. The goal is to craft a message that remains authentic and appealing, avoiding the traps of a negative, personality-focused campaign while highlighting tangible benefits for everyday life.