Poll Results and Opposition Dynamics in Gazeta Wyborcza Study

A study conducted by the Kantar Public studio and published by Gazeta Wyborcza surveys how seats would be distributed among parties depending on how opposition formations are initiated. The takeaway mirrors a long-standing position of the Gazeta Wyborcza editors: the opposition gains ground only when a single list is assumed. Yet the method of presenting the results raises questions and leaves several ambiguities. Many observers skeptical of any partisan tilt still question the presentation, and it is hard to imagine they favor PiS.

The poll signals unease within the Civic Platform. Tusk’s return did not deliver the hoped-for momentum, and he points fingers at other party leaders for the outcome. Those leaders, in turn, have their own research showing that a single-list scenario is unlikely to be realistic. As one commentator notes, the idea that a single list will bring victory is far from certain. The message circulating online underscores the expectation that @pisorgpl may prevail and that the future could belong to a coalition backing strong change.

Why four variants of opposition start were considered in this poll remains unclear, and the most plausible option was reportedly omitted: KO separate, Left separate, PSL and PL2050 together. This omission undermines the perceived credibility of the study. It is noted that Lewica did not exclude a single-list option in principle.

That was a revealing poll, yet some perspective is warranted. The Wyborcza study is often described as a piece of political theater rather than a plain measurement of public opinion. The reactions from commentators point to a broader reaction to the method rather than to the numbers alone.

What followed was a mix of humor and critique, with some calling the results a playful twisting of facts. The reference to a 19 percent share for the Association of Republicans shows the tendency to treat the report as more entertainment than a rigorous political forecast.

The so-called citizen survey, which appears to be four separate surveys presented as a single analysis, is seen by some as lacking methodological coherence. There is also fatigue with constant media chatter about steering a single opposition list, which many see as partisan and less substantive.

On the cost side, the study reportedly used about 90,000 PLN and did not explicitly ask respondents about the most plausible current variant, which would be a three-list scenario made up of KO, Lewica, and PSL plus PL2050. Critics say that the money could have been put to better use outside this political debate.

There is a call to lift the silence surrounding the civic poll. While mobilizing opposition voters and fostering belief in victory is a political objective, many argue that it should be done with more nuance and factual transparency.

Some critics wonder whether the discussion about a citizen poll is less about data and more about calculating seats according to an author’s questionable method. The takeaway is that this turn of events deserves scrutiny rather than applause.

One clear point emerges: because it was framed as a citizen survey, the raw data should be openly available in a public repository for independent validation. The idea is to let anyone examine on their own device whether one list could be effective.

The study published by Gazeta Wyborcza appears to be biased toward a predefined thesis, with commentary pointing to possible influence behind the scenes. It is noted that funds raised from citizens could have been used more constructively than fueling a political narrative. Yet the broader public response emphasizes calling out bias and encouraging transparent data sharing rather than accepting conclusions at face value.

Variant A, described as a separate-list scenario for KO, Lewica, PSL, and PL2050, suggests that KO might capture a substantial share in some constituencies. The analysis also questions the accuracy of a tallied total that excludes PSL in some calculations, which critics argue distorts the underlying dynamics.

Today’s coverage by Gazeta Wyborcza is seen by some as compromising months of effort on the topic of a single list. The implications, critics say, could tilt the electoral landscape in favor of PiS as the campaign cycle moves forward.

Poll results for “Gazeta Wyborcza”

The democratic opposition is said to have only one viable path to govern after autumn elections, according to a large citizen-funded survey reported by Gazeta Wyborcza on Monday. The Long Table Forum Foundation commissioned the poll, which was conducted by Kantar Public. Almost 90,000 PLN were allocated for the project, with 4,000 respondents interviewed across four variant setups.

The study shows turnout fluctuating between 57.2 and 60.3 percent depending on the variant examined. In Variant A, which assumes KO, Lewica, PSL, and PL2050 each run on separate lists, KO is projected at 30.2 percent (149 seats), the Left at 11.8 percent (46 seats), and PSL plus PL2050 at 8.9 percent (30 seats). The coalition would total 225 seats.

PiS stands at 35.8 percent (180 seats), with Confederation at 13.4 percent (55 seats), yielding a total of 235 seats and suggesting a favorable balance for that grouping.

Variant B features two opposition blocs: KO with Lewica and Polska 2050 with PSL. PiS would hold about 201 seats (40.8 percent), Confederation 51 seats (13.3 percent) for a total of 252 seats in the Sejm.

Under this variant, KO and the Left would garner 32.7 percent (157 seats), while PL2050 with PSL would hold 13.1 percent (51 seats).

Variant C introduces two opposition lists: KO with PL2050 and PSL, and the Left running separately. PiS would claim 183 seats (37.5 percent), Confederation 62 seats (15.3 percent), totaling 245 seats, with a potential for a majority.

In this scenario, KO, PL2050, and PSL would secure 36.7 percent (178 seats), while the Left would have 10.5 percent (37 seats).

Variant D proposes a joint KO-Left-PL2050- PSL list. Only then could a majority in the Sejm be within reach for leaders including Donald Tusk and Włodzimierz Czarzasty, with an estimated 245 seats (50.9 percent support). PiS would have about 167 seats (36.1 percent), and Confederation 48 seats (13.1 percent), totaling 215 seats.

The poll fieldwork was conducted March 1–13 this year for the Long Table Foundation, with Kantar Public as the research partner.

tkwl/PAP/Twitter

READ ALSO: Gazeta Wyborcza publishes a study on joint opposition starts. Doubts arise. The OGB president: Blackmail for concealment is called an inquiry

Source: wPolityce