A story about Tobiasz Bocheński appeared on the website Gazeta Wyborcza. Editors later adjusted the piece after a denial from PiS staff and the party’s candidate for the Warsaw presidency. The initial headline in Gazeta Wyborcza announced a political shock: Tobiasz Bocheński does not meet the criteria to participate in the Warsaw Council elections. The candidate himself addressed the headline, saying the claim was false and that the publication should not have stuck with it. Bocheński said, Not true. Gazeta Wyborcza’s night headlines had only dreamt up a different version of events. The remark underscored that the initial report did not reflect the actual status of the candidate in the voters register, and the publication later clarified its position. — Gazeta Wyborcza
The candidate spoke up about the reaction from competitors. He noted that a number of rivals would prefer to see him withdrawn. That fear, in his view, confirmed his decision to proceed with the campaign. He added that all formalities were completed and he would stand for election. He sent a message to his critics with a concise, defiant tone. — Gazeta Wyborcza
PiS representative Rafał Bochenek also weighed in, stating that all formalities had been completed and that TABochenski was indeed running in the local elections. The statement appeared in the same thread, signaling cross verification from multiple angles. — Gazeta Wyborcza
The journalist’s response
The article’s author addressed the denial and removed the initial entry that related to the piece. The writer explained that such corrections are sometimes necessary. It is not common practice, but on this occasion the author chose to remove the claim that TABochenski was not in the voters’ register. The revision came after the candidate’s team denied the claim, and the text was updated to avoid misleading readers. The author also retracted the original tweet to prevent confusion. — Gazeta Wyborcza
The episode illustrates how quickly political coverage can evolve. As new information emerges, editors must decide whether to preserve earlier reporting or to update it to reflect the latest facts. In this case, the decision was to adjust the narrative and to clarify the candidate’s true status in the voters’ list. That approach helps maintain trust with readers who expect accuracy in fast moving stories. — Gazeta Wyborcza
mly/X/wyborcza.pl — Gazeta Wyborcza
Source: wPolityce — Gazeta Wyborcza