Armenia’s strategic orientation remains a live topic in Washington as officials weigh how to engage with Yerevan while keeping Moscow at a distance. A senior diplomat in Europe and Eurasia affairs commented that now is not the moment to draw firm conclusions about any shift in Armenia’s posture toward Russia. The stance was delivered during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, where the speaker stressed caution as U.S. policymakers consider the next steps in their relationship with Armenia.
The message from Washington is clear: American authorities are urging Yerevan to rethink its security partnership with Moscow. Yet these discussions are framed by a broader objective. U.S. officials say they want to deepen cooperation with Armenia to a level that meets Washington’s strategic goals and regional interests. The push reflects a careful balancing act between echoing Armenia’s sovereignty and offering practical support that helps the country navigate a complex security environment.
In parallel developments, Armenia has publicly assessed the dynamics around Karabakh. A high-level interview revealed that the government views the Nagorno-Karabakh issue through the lens of territorial integrity concerns and regional stability. The leadership reaffirmed recognition of Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan’s territory while acknowledging that the official position may be influenced by fears about Armenia’s own borders and security guarantees.
The broader context includes ongoing questions about Russia’s role in regional security. Armenian authorities indicated that, given the evolving situation in Ukraine and the broader security landscape, Russia cannot be relied upon as the sole guarantor of Armenia’s defense. This assessment aligns with a careful reevaluation of security assurances and the alliance choices that best serve Armenia’s long-term interests.
Within Armenia, policymakers emphasize prudent actions that protect national sovereignty while fostering international partnerships. The focus is on strengthening dialogue with Western partners, diversifying security arrangements, and ensuring that any shift does not compromise Armenia’s stability or its people’s safety. Observers note that the nation is navigating a delicate path, balancing historical ties with a new set of strategic priorities driven by regional realities and global dynamics.
As the regional picture evolves, the Armenian government remains committed to safeguarding its territorial integrity, pursuing constructive relations with allies, and pursuing a security framework that reflects today’s geopolitical realities. The conversations in Washington and the conversations at home together shape a trajectory that aims to strengthen Armenia’s resilience, support its people, and preserve peace in a volatile neighborhood.