A security incident unfolded this morning when Ángeles Béjar, a high-profile figure connected to Spanish football administration, took shelter inside the Divina Pastora church in Motril. The event drew attention not only for its dramatic setting but also for what she described as a hunger strike aimed at forcing a resolution to what she calls a harsh and violent pursuit against her son, Luis Rubiales. She spoke of indignity and harm she believes has been directed at him, insisting that he does not deserve the treatment he has received.
Rubiales’s mother, who holds a leadership role that was temporarily suspended, asserted that she would remain in her position around the clock until justice is achieved for her son. She indicated that her sister joined her in the church, noting that the religious community and local supporters had begun to rally around their cause. The family’s stance was conveyed to media colleagues, who reported that Ángeles Béjar would stay inside the parish until a fair resolution is reached, following the departure of the church’s pastor from the premises.
In interviews, Ángeles Béjar also appealed to Jenni Hermoso, a member of the national women’s football team who was involved in a widely publicized kiss incident with the team’s manager at a major awards ceremony. Béjar urged Hermoso to share the truth and to adhere to the version of events that had been provided earlier, arguing that transparency is essential as the case moves forward. Her remarks emphasized a desire for clarity and accountability in the evolving narrative surrounding the incident.
According to Béjar, she disputes the claim of sexual abuse, arguing that the interactions she has observed indicate mutual consent and are supported by the circulated footage. She questioned the intensity and the perceived cruelty of the response to her son, and she asked observers to consider what she describes as a broader context behind the entire situation. Her position rests on the belief that her son is not capable of harming anyone, and she urged others to approach the matter with fairness and restraint, especially given the public pressure surrounding the case.
As a mother, she framed her stance as an appeal for understanding, stressing that any parent could find themselves in a similar predicament under intense scrutiny. The situation, she suggested, illustrates how easily a private family matter can become a public controversy, amplifying emotions on all sides while complicating the search for truth and justice. The press and supporters alike watched closely as the hours passed, with observers noting the impact of the hunger strike announcement on public sentiment and on discussions within the broader sports community.
The episode has sparked discussions about the limits of media coverage, the responsibilities of public figures under investigation, and the role of family voices in shaping the narrative during sensitive probes. While some viewers view the mother’s actions as a powerful plea for fair treatment, others caution against actions that could influence ongoing investigations or create unintended consequences for those involved. Throughout the day, supporters and critics offered a mix of opinions, reflecting the complexity of balancing human emotion with the demands of due process.
In the midst of these developments, observers called for careful verification of all statements and careful handling of the facts as they emerge. The case, which has drawn attention from national and international audiences, continues to unfold across multiple fronts, including legal, ethical, and sporting dimensions. The evolving statements from family members, athletes, and officials contribute to a layered picture that requires thoughtful analysis and patience as the investigation progresses.
Source: Goal