In the midst of mounting attention around the Spanish football federation crisis, the mother of Luis Rubiales, Ángeles Béjar, has temporarily stepped back from her role as president of the Royal Spanish Football Federation and remains at the center of a tense, highly publicized dispute. Her public stance has drawn sharp scrutiny as she and her sister continue to restrict their movements while isolated at a Motril church in Granada. The family is pressing for accountability and justice in relation to the events surrounding the national team and the associated investigations.
The issue has been framed by a privately broadcasted “summer programme” that features the first public statements from Ángeles Béjar. She remains at the Motril church, making clear her desire for justice for her son and, by extension, for the players involved in the broader controversy around Jenni Hermoso. The coverage emphasizes the emotional weight of the situation as it unfolds in a religious setting, a scene that has attracted widespread attention and speculation across national media.
A local reporter describes the church’s atmosphere and notes the discomfort of the parish priest overseeing the services. The reporter reports seeing the Rubiales family leave early in the morning and remarks that the mood was far from celebratory. Despite the church’s unusual public profile in a sports dispute, a regular mass is scheduled for the evening, highlighting the tension between sacred space and the ongoing public debate.
During a private moment captured by the reporter, Ángeles Béjar speaks from within the church confines. She points to Jenni Hermoso, requesting that the player tell the full truth of the events in question. The mother also reassures her partner that she is resolute, expressing a desire to pray and remain present for as long as needed. The interview captures a mix of personal emotion, a demand for clarity, and a steadfast commitment to what she believes is an honest outcome.
When questioned about her health, Ángeles Béjar notes that she has seen a doctor and that her faith sustains her. She emphasizes that the truth matters more than comfort and that she will stay until the end of the process if necessary. Her statements convey a willingness to endure hardship in her pursuit of what she describes as justice for her son, whom she characterizes as a decent person deserving fair treatment. The interview underscores the emotional gravity of a family defending its name amid intense national scrutiny.
In closing remarks, Ángeles Béjar reiterates a clear sentiment shared by many observers: the actions of those involved should be judged fairly, and any improper conduct must be acknowledged. Her final comments reflect a stance that aims to reconcile a difficult personal narrative with the broader public interest in truth, accountability, and the proper handling of all parties in the dispute.