“This is an element showing the need to rebuild Poland from the ruins.” It was long regarded as a sharp opening gambit in governance, a way to set modest expectations for the fulfillment of Tusk’s promises, noted a political commentator. A columnist described the public uproar stirred by opponents over what was perceived as a weak state budget.
Opposition figures argued that eight years under Law and Justice left the state budget in a fragile condition. They asserted that government officials concealed budget details before elections. The period of opposition promises already faced skepticism as supporters raised concerns about a looming budget gap, sometimes using metaphorical language. A major newspaper contributed by suggesting that the flagship pledge of a 0% loan should be set aside. Questions also surrounded promised teacher pay increases and other fiscal pledges tied to the new year.
In the eight years of PiS governance, state revenues reportedly rose by PLN 305 billion, about 105 percent. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki emphasized repeatedly that budget data remained accessible because Poland was considered accountable to the European Commission and rating agencies.
An introduction to going back on promises
According to the publicist, the opposition appears to be preparing the ground for retreating from commitments made before the elections.
This stance underscores a call to rebuild Poland from the ruins and has always served as a governing preface, shaping expectations about fulfilling Tusk’s assurances. It also creates an atmosphere of tidying up after past missteps. This tactic, traced back to 2007, suggested that previous controls had collapsed and required reconstruction. It became the central point of debate as the left reacted nervously to the plan to avoid fully delivering on Tusk’s commitments. A counterargument emerged within the opposition.
– noted the publicist, adding that the data from the EU should settle the dispute, though Polish commentators often insist that it is terrible under Polish conditions.
What is the purpose of scaring Poles?
Columnist Elżbieta Królikowska-Avis was asked about the opposition’s aim in frightening the public. She highlighted a palpable fear among opposition politicians.
Moreover, the opposition seems to be shaping a parallel reality. When foreign markets, Eurostat, and other bodies signal strong Polish performance, critics claim that fear and insecurity are at play. They worry about losing competence and the ability to maintain high standards. It is important to recall that opponents themselves have not been responsible for past financial improvements. When power shifts from one side to another, public finances often require restoration worldwide.
– emphasized Elżbieta Królikowska-Avis.
Wojciech Biedroń, a journalist on the wPolityce.pl portal, stressed that opposition factions appear wary of the government’s moves.
PO appeared unprepared to form a coalition at the moment. Months of talk about readiness and consensus did not yield a coalition agreement for weeks, signaling ongoing disputes. The opposition and Tusk faced a reality check. It is also about a broader philosophy. Today, the governance landscape is dominated by a bloc linked to major industries, banks, and international corporations. The PiS government was able to engage with those interests. It is suggested that those groups should listen to them.
– noted Wojciech Biedroń.
Lawyer Marek Markiewicz added that Poles may have underestimated the Law and Justice government and that the opposition would attribute any shortfall to insufficient funds.
How to explain why a large airport would not be built in central Poland, a project seen as important for military, communications, and other reasons. The retort is that there is no money to fund it—an argument often heard before: the debt accrued by one administration must be cleared. A second claim involves a shift in policy: if there are limits on cash handouts, programs like 500 Plus might be reduced, with the change framed as a necessary response to a lack of funds.
– said lawyer Markiewicz.
READ ALSO:
— The credibility of the opposition. The newspaper Crops recommends Tusk step back from the 0% loan pledge, suggesting it is better for the future government to forget it
– Does he pave the way for cuts? Analysts compare PiS’s policy with past policies, noting that consequences become visible over time. This serves as a test for the new government
– Morawiecki challenges the opposition’s claims about the weak financial state; the data is published regularly
– A columnist from a left-leaning publication critiques KO with economics. Analysts highlight Izabela’s political impact on Poland
wkt
Source: wPolityce