Some observers framed the dispute as a legal confrontation, while others, including the speaker, viewed it as a case of political intrigue—a political retaliation that touched Mariusz Kamiński and another deputy on December 20 and again on January 9, as described during an RMF FM interview with a Law and Justice member of parliament.
Hołownia closed the Sejm
On Wednesday, February 7, the scene unfolded as Maciej Wąsik and Mariusz Kamiński tried to enter the Sejm to fulfill their parliamentary duties. Security and the marshal’s guard initially blocked their entry, after which Hołownia gave orders to close the entrances. Jarosław Kaczyński urged that passage be allowed for the two MPs, while the guard directed them to the pass office for proper clearance to access the Sejm grounds.
A document obtained by the wPolityce.pl portal indicates that Sejm Chairman Szymon Hołownia issued an order preventing Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik from entering the Sejm. The president of PiS emphasized that this action was procedural in nature.
STUDY FURTHER: The document cited in discussions by PiS leadership confirms the order restricting entry to the Sejm for Kamiński and Wąsik.
There were assertions that Hołownia did not permit the entry of the two MPs, with claims of fear and that those responsible for obstructing parliamentary duties would be held to account.
The conversation also noted that the two MPs would face consequences for attempting to enter the Sejm and perform their duties, and that legal avenues would be explored to address the situation.
An act of political revenge
During an interview on RMF FM, Wąsik argued that Hołownia’s measures amounted to political retaliation. Perspectives varied, with some seeing the events as part of broader political maneuvering, while others suggested it reflected deeper tensions within the political landscape. The deputy suggested the incident dated back to December 20 and resurfaced in January as part of ongoing disputes.
– said the PiS MP. Wąsik noted he would not attempt to re-enter the Sejm on the day in question, signaling a pause in direct confrontation while leaving open the possibility of future steps to fulfill his mandate.
Wąsik spoke of a climate where strong actions prompted fear, and he described Hołownia as visibly cautious of the political dynamics at play. The parliamentarian suggested that Hołownia’s approach hindered the ability of him and Kamiński to carry out parliamentary duties, and he indicated that legal action and consultations with lawyers would be pursued.
The dialogue reflected a view that those who used force or intimidation were reacting to pressure, and it hinted at a belief that accountability would be pursued for those responsible for decisions affecting parliamentary work.
Stay in jail
When asked about his treatment in detention, the former deputy head of the Ministry of the Interior and Administrative Affairs described the prison service as professional. He encountered understanding from fellow inmates who listened to his side of the story, yet he did not report that anyone treated him in a special way.
He was cautious about discussing any form of mistreatment but described a controversial moment involving Mariusz Kamiński during a prior stay. He referenced a medical procedure of inserting a tube, expressing concerns that the action might be viewed as punitive and retaliatory rather than legitimate medical necessity.
The discussion continued with reflections on the broader political struggle and the role of security and judicial institutions in the ongoing narrative, noting that information about court-approved wiretapping remained confidential.
Pegasus Commission
The dialogue touched on the Pegasus Commission of Inquiry. When asked about appearing before the committee, Wąsik replied that attendance would depend on being admitted to the Sejm, and he would participate if allowed.
He criticized the idea of real-time listening as a distraction from more substantial issues, suggesting that data collection and official handling of files have evolved since 16 years ago. He asserted that there would be no return to past conditions.
Wąsik stressed that neither he nor the services under Kamiński were under opposition supervision, noting that the security services took action against those suspected of crimes. He indicated that these operations were authorized and that the court had oversight over certain actions, while asserting that information about specific court-approved wiretapping remained confidential.
Asked about reports of monitoring and eavesdropping on PiS politicians during the previous government, he described much of that information as inaccurate. The discussion highlighted that public perception of surveillance remains a contested topic within the political arena.
The exchange also touched on broader inquiries into the conduct of commission members and counterintelligence considerations, with ongoing debates about accountability and transparency in security operations.
In closing remarks, Wąsik offered a candid view of the ongoing investigative atmosphere, arguing that the spectacle surrounding commission inquiries reflects a charged political climate where information, counterclaims, and legal processes intersect in a high-stakes environment.
wkt/RMF FM