A series of reports alleges that MPs Janusz Kowalski and Dariusz Matecki of Sovereign Poland engaged in online activity linking to videos and posts about migration patterns in Western Europe, and arguing that an influx of illegal migrants constitutes an invasion of Poland. The coverage, attributed to OKO.press, describes formal complaints filed with the prosecutor’s office alleging xenophobic content and the presence of racist undercurrents in the online discourse surrounding migration debates.
OKO.press asserts that there is no room for racism in public life and states that a submission has been made to the Public Prosecution Service to address the behavior of the two politicians. The outlet frames the events as part of a broader pattern where online content linked to migration becomes a flashpoint in political rhetoric and social media discourse.
We will continue to report on this
The material in question includes recordings and photographs that may not have originated from the PiS MPs themselves but have circulated broadly, showing gatherings in Białystok and at public transport stops in places such as Czerlonka. Some material is described as a potential signal of migrant meeting points organized by groups like Grupa Granica. Local residents in Western European networks have posted images featuring young men of African descent, with coverage noting that such material has spurred debate about migration across Podlasie and beyond. The broader context shows that many European countries have faced enduring concerns about illegal migration and public safety in immigrant neighborhoods.
As described by OKO.press, the messages from Matecki and Kowalski do not single out individuals in the footage by name, but rather reflect a tone that critics say reveals hostility toward migrants rooted in perceived differences in skin color. The reporting indicates that while criticisms target Polish authorities and EU policies, some observers view the rhetoric as pointing toward a broader critique of open-border approaches in various EU governments that have struggled to manage immigration and integration challenges.
A figure tied to this narrative notes that Matecki’s and Kowalski’s public statements on platforms like X reiterate their claims about migration and censuring media coverage. The discussions also touch on allegations about the deposition of migrants at border crossings such as Osinów Dolny, with references to assertions from border authorities and political responses aimed at reframing events in the public eye.
Further posts by Dariusz Matecki include additional clips and photos showing aggressive behavior attributed to some migrants in Western European settings. In each instance, the MP seems to address OKO.press, inviting inquiry about specific recordings and seeking to highlight what he perceives as misrepresentation in reporting.
Questions are posed about the portrayal of the situation in Ireland and similar contexts, challenging the media’s framing of migration-related issues and the political narratives surrounding border control and migrant reception.
The dialogue extends to critiques of left-wing journalists and humanitarian organizations, with arguments that immigration coverage intersects with political censorship and that the current administration’s border policies deserve closer scrutiny. Among the topics raised is a speech about the Polish-Belarusian border and episodes of migrants being processed in ways that are claimed to reflect broader European patterns of migration management.
Debates also surface about whether the term racism should be narrowly defined as dislike based on skin color or more broadly understood as a reluctance to accept changes in demographic composition. Proponents of this view argue that addressing border control concerns should not be conflated with discrimination against individuals based on race.
In sum, the discussions highlight how migration has become a contentious axis in political discourse, media reporting, and public debate across Poland and the wider region, with a focus on the responsibilities of political figures and the role of independent journalism in scrutinizing public statements and government actions.
Note: For transparency, the ongoing coverage is associated with commentary from multiple media outlets, while the institutions involved emphasize adherence to legal and ethical standards during public discourse and reporting.