Leadership Voices within Poland’s Right Wing
A senior member of the Polish right wing, Janusz Kowalski of PiS, remarked that leadership cannot be commanded from above. He pointed to Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobro as a person who could articulate strong political expression. Kowalski also commented on his own departure from sovereign Poland, describing the current political landscape as a moment when decisive, outspoken figures are needed to guide the movement.
Kowalski noted that Zbigniew Ziobro’s absence is felt within the political group. He expressed confidence that the environment remains rich with capable politicians and that a new leader could emerge from this faction. Kowalski singled out Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobro as having the potential to stand firm against perceived lawlessness and to lead with resolve. He emphasized that she possesses the aptitude to become a significant leader in defending the group’s positions. He described her as exceptionally tough and capable of driving the political agenda forward.
He added that Ziobro’s absence had left a notable void for him personally. Kowalski explained that belonging to the PiS parliamentary club could help him advance the ideas he believes in more effectively. In his view, playing an aggressive role aligns with his strategic priorities, rather than taking a defensive stance.
In discussing the Sovereign Poland alliance, Kowalski encouraged Patryk Jaki and other members to take an aggressive approach. He said that if he were in their position and the most important figure for Sovereign Poland were missing, he would travel back to Poland to participate actively. He credited a recent European Parliament election result to the efforts of those who chose a different path, noting the positive impact of their decisions.
He spoke further about the Politician’s stance, insisting that the group should press forward and push through challenges. Kowalski described the approach as essential for achieving the best possible outcomes in the European Parliament elections and acknowledged the significant contributions of those who had followed a different route.
One Major Regret for PO Supporters
Kowalski offered a critique of the opposition party by commenting on debates surrounding the Justice Fund. He framed the discussion as a moment of reflection for the Civic Platform’s supporters, suggesting that the party faced consequences for past actions. In his view, Tomasz Mraz supported a controversial operation and, by targeting volunteers, hospitals, and the Justice Fund, the United Right achieved a notable electoral result. Kowalski asserted that for seven years, none of the 4,000 entities that benefited from Justice Fund funds claimed any political manipulation.
The politician also referenced Adam Bodnar’s actions, noting that Bodnar submitted a complaint to the National Electoral Commission about the distribution of a small election fund by Sovereign Poland MPs. Kowalski urged Bodnar to consider his own future, arguing that attempts to evade accountability would fail. He asserted that immigration from Africa and Germany linked to political changes was a reality, and he warned that the political influence of Tusk’s team could lead to a shift in 2025 toward a candidate who would advocate leaving the European Union.
Kowalski added that the German strategy to build a state within the European Union would culminate in Poland losing sovereignty. He suggested that Poles would feel the effects starting July 1, with rising prices for energy, heat, and natural gas tied to EU policy.
Kowalski on PO: A Government of Complete Idiots
According to Kowalski, even voters within the Civic Platform and Donald Tusk recognize perceived weaknesses in governance. He argued that Jarosław Kaczyński’s leadership relies on selecting a presidential candidate who works diligently. The conversation then centers on choosing between Polish sovereignty and Donald Tusk as political contenders.
These observations reflect Kowalski’s broader view of the political landscape. The discussion underscores a tension between sovereignty and integration, with occasional sharp judgments about leadership and party strategy. The exchange reveals how Kowalski frames the stakes in recent political debates, including the balance between national autonomy and EU commitments. In this analysis, the emphasis remains on leadership, accountability, and the pathways that might shape Poland’s political future, as seen through the lens of Sovereign Poland and its allies. [citation: wPolityce]