A statement floated during a radio interview suggested that a government led by the PSL Prime Minister would present a significant opportunity for the PSL itself. This idea was linked to the possibility that Kosiniak-Kamysz could become Prime Minister, or perhaps serve in that role for more than one term. The remark came from MEP Zdzisław Krasnodębski on Radio Wnet, in response to comments by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki while discussing the potential of a PSL-led administration.
Kosiniak-Kamysz Prime Minister?
The political landscape has seen talks with the opposition grow more intricate, with shifting roles debated as a possibility. For now, the chairman of the Sejm remains a central figure, but a rotation among prime minister or ministerial positions could emerge if current negotiations continue. Close inspection reveals a lack of broad programmatic alignment among the parties involved.
Professor Krasnodębski underscored this point, noting the fragility of consensus in the current climate.
Towards the PiS bloc, there is a sense that the opposition seeks to marginalize not only the party but also its backers. Krasnodębski highlighted that a sizable share of voters — about a third — who backed Law and Justice after eight years of governance still sees value in the party. This, in his view, represents a meaningful electoral foothold.
The MEP added that negotiations would be difficult yet necessary. He also suggested that the president might entrust the task of forming a government to Mateusz Morawiecki as part of the evolving discussions.
From Krasnodębski’s perspective, the Prime Minister’s comments should be read within a broader pattern. He asserted that Law and Justice has always been open to dialogue, even as critics claim the party lacks coalition capacity. He attributed any perceived reluctance to talk to the opposition since 2015 to the opposition’s own unwillingness to engage or cooperate. Sociological data, in his view, indicate that PiS supporters are willing to discuss with people holding different views, though he noted that some build walls instead. He argued that is the lens through which Morawiecki’s remarks should be interpreted.
The MEP also stated that talks with PSL and with Third Way are underway, emphasizing the involvement of politicians sharing compatible views.
A government led by a PSL Prime Minister would be a meaningful milestone for the PSL itself. For Kosiniak-Kamysz, the possibility of becoming Prime Minister could mark a historic turn in Polish governance, potentially extending beyond a single term.
Professor Krasnodębski reaffirmed this outlook as talks with PSL and other groups continue to unfold.
REVIEW OF POLITICAL POSSIBILITIES:
The discussion also touched on a broader question of how a future administration might be formed. Analysts suggest that the opposition could face challenges replicating a stable majority, and that conversations about ministerial roles may become more contentious as positions are allocated. In this climate, the balance of power and the ability to build a workable coalition remain at the forefront of strategic considerations.
In another thread of the interview, attention turned to EU reform. The European Parliament’s Constitutional Affairs Committee has endorsed reports proposing changes to EU treaties, with aims spanning a shift away from unanimity in certain Council decisions and a reallocation of competences to the EU level in environmental protection and biodiversity. The plan would also broaden shared competences to cover foreign and security policy, border control, forestry, public health, civil protection, industry, and education. The discussion signals a potential reweighting of sovereignty among member states.
Poland’s perspective on these changes was described as cautious. The upcoming November vote in the European Parliament on these proposals could set the stage for major political negotiations. The speaker underscored that while some radical provisions might be softened through talks, the core question is about the distribution of power within the EU. A more centralized EU framework could, in the view of some observers, diminish national sovereignty, particularly if unanimity is eliminated and the European Commission is reorganized.
The MEP reiterated that Polish capacity to maneuver in European politics is limited and that a more radical reform would test the resilience of national sovereignty. He noted that big member states are likely to resist concessions that would substantially dilute their influence, while smaller states face economic and political pressures that shape their positions. The discussion also reflected concerns about how changes could affect defense policy and national autonomy within Europe.
As the commentary concluded, Krasnodębski cautioned that while resistance exists, it is not uniform across all countries. He pointed to the influence of economic pressures and funding concerns, which complicate the negotiation process for smaller states. He stressed Poland’s potential role within the EU and argued that a radically reimagined union could risk disintegration rather than strengthening the collective project.
In his closing remarks, Krasnodębski suggested that the situation would continue to unfold as member states weigh their options and the EU debates proceed. He emphasized the importance of calm, informed positions that reflect national interests while engaging constructively in a broad European dialogue.
wkt