In a RMF FM interview, PSL president Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz stated clearly that he will not form a coalition with PiS. He also weighed in on what President Andrzej Duda might do if public support shifts toward a different government coalition. Kosiniak-Kamysz suggested that if turnout reflects a desire for change, the president should engage with the political circles capable of building a new government and consider those options rather than sticking with the current arrangement.
No coalition with PiS
Kosiniak-Kamysz reiterated his stance against joining forces with Jarosław Kaczyński’s PiS. He recalled the PSL campaign motto, which framed the choice as either the Third Way or a third term for PiS, a message that resonated with many voters seeking a government change. The PSL leader emphasized that voters who backed the Third Way were signaling a desire for a new administration rather than continuing with the existing one.
The president’s path forward
Asked what President Duda should do in this scenario, Kosiniak-Kamysz advocated for consultations with parties capable of forming a viable government. He argued that if the majority of citizens indicate a desire for change, the president should speak with those political groups and evaluate the possibilities, rather than feeling bound to appoint a premier from the party that finished first, second, or third in the vote. Kosiniak-Kamysz also noted that the president is not obligated by the constitution to choose the leader of the party with the most seats when forming a government.
When pressed about whether opposition leaders had discussed who their prime minister candidate might be, the PSL head answered in the negative. He stressed that dialogues would occur, decisions would follow, and there would be no rush to define who could lead the government. He asserted that all potential scenarios remained open as final results continued to emerge from the National Electoral Commission.
The discussion underscored the evolving political landscape as results shifted. Kosiniak-Kamysz noted that the final configuration of alliances would depend on voter turnout and the coalitions that could emerge to form a stable government. His comments framed a pragmatic approach: seek broad consultations, respect constitutional possibilities, and remain flexible about who could lead the executive branch depending on the outcome of the election.
As late results rolled in, it became clear that the question of who would head the government would be contested and multi-faceted. The evolving scenario pointed to a period of negotiations where various factions could contribute to a new governing majority rather than following a single party line. This perspective aligned with the PSL’s broader aim of promoting a third political path that could attract a wider spectrum of voters seeking change.
Analysts noted that the conversation touched on a fundamental political question in Poland: how to assemble a government that reflects public demand for change while maintaining stability and institutional cooperation. Kosiniak-Kamysz’s remarks highlighted the possibility that President Duda could play a pivotal role in mediating among parties willing to form a coalition capable of governing effectively. The emphasis on broad consultations suggested a move away from exclusive bloc-building toward a more inclusive process that prioritizes consensus and governance quality.
In the wake of the discussions, observers anticipated a period of intense negotiation as parties defined potential portfolios and policy directions. The ultimate composition of the government would depend on negotiations, public support, and constitutional provisions that allow flexibility in choosing the prime minister. The conversation itself signaled a shift toward a more collaborative, process-driven approach to governance at a moment when many citizens appeared ready for change.
Officials and commentators alike noted that the election results did not immediately determine a single path. Instead, they opened multiple scenarios, with the possibility that a broad-based coalition or a minority arrangement supported by various factions could prevail. In that climate, the role of President Duda could become increasingly influential as he weighs the interests of different political actors and the expectations of the public.
Ultimately, Kosiniak-Kamysz’s statements framed a pragmatic vision for Poland’s leadership. He argued for a methodical, inclusive approach to forming a government that reflects voter intent while ensuring institutional stability. The conversation underscored a shared goal among many parties: to secure a durable and accountable administration that can address the country’s immediate priorities with broad support from the electorate. The evolving discourse indicated that the final outcome would be shaped by ongoing dialogue, careful calculation, and a willingness to explore options beyond traditional party lines.
Source: wPolityce