In the latest briefing, the Russian Defense Ministry reported no ceasefire violations in Karabakh over the past 24 hours. The ministry’s statement emphasized that the security situation remained stable and that there were no identified breaches of the truce in the contested region.
Observers noted that armed formations in Nagorno-Karabakh have begun to surrender their weapons, a development described by officials as part of a broader process aimed at reducing armament within the area. This update follows days of dialogue among regional authorities about steps toward de-escalation and confidence-building measures amid ongoing tensions.
Earlier, the Armenian government disclosed figures related to shelter provisions for displaced residents from Nagorno-Karabakh. Nazeli Bagdasaryan, the press secretary to Armenia’s prime minister, briefed reporters on the status of temporary housing arrangements and the humanitarian response. The update highlighted that around 35,000 people displaced from the region had been offered temporary shelter as part of ongoing relief efforts.
According to official data, more than 82,800 residents from Karabakh were registered in Armenia, and roughly 21,000 vehicles had entered Armenian territory from the enclave. The numbers illustrate the scale of displacement and the logistical challenge of supporting a steady flow of refugees through border and transit points during the period of heightened activity in the region.
By late September, officials indicated that more than 100,000 refugees had relocated from Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia since the start of Azerbaijan’s anti-terrorism operations. This statistic, released on September 30, underscored the rapid pace of population movement and the enduring humanitarian needs arising from the conflict in the South Caucasus.
On September 19, Azerbaijani authorities announced a local operation in Karabakh, stating that the objective was to suppress large-scale provocations, disarm combatants, and withdraw Armenian army units from the region. The announcement signaled a phase of military actions intended to restore a sense of security for neighboring communities, while also triggering international attention to the evolving security landscape in the area.
In the broader diplomatic arena, there has been ongoing discussion about the mutual recognition of territorial integrity between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Officials have in the past signaled a willingness to explore arrangements that acknowledge each other’s borders while addressing the security and governance needs of Nagorno-Karabakh residents. The current dialogue reflects a balance between pursuing stability on the ground and navigating the sensitivities surrounding sovereignty and self-determination in the region.
Analysts note that the absence of reported ceasefire violations in the latest daily briefing does not necessarily imply a permanent end to hostilities. Rather, it points to a momentary lull that could enable humanitarian operations, verification visits, and the implementation of disarmament plans. International observers continue to urge restraint from all parties, calling for transparent monitoring mechanisms and predictable, civilian-centered relief efforts that can operate amid residual risk factors.
Public communication from both sides has stressed the importance of maintaining the protection of civilians, ensuring accurate information dissemination, and facilitating safe corridors for aid delivery. The evolving narrative in Karabakh is shaped by the interplay between security measures, humanitarian responsibilities, and the political undertakings that influence the prospect of durable peace in the South Caucasus. In this context, regional authorities and international partners remain engaged in assessing the effectiveness of ceasefire provisions, verification protocols, and the readiness of authorities to uphold commitments that support long-term stability.
Across the border milieu, observers are watching for further clarity on the operational steps, the pace of disarmament, and the prospective timelines for broader political arrangements. The situation remains fluid, with ongoing reporting focused on troop movements, humanitarian flows, and the status of displaced communities as they navigate an uncertain but potentially stabilizing phase in the region.