What are EU policymakers pursuing? A discussion about the overlap of two ongoing processes at the European Union level, capable of influencing Poland in significant ways, as noted by a presidential adviser on the X platform.
There is active work within EU institutions to reform the EU treaty framework. The European Parliament has recently passed resolutions that advocate for stronger central governance and the transfer of additional powers toward the Community.
– Żaryn notes
READ ALSO:
– Fogiel: The Union we supported is changing. It is moving toward a form of a super state
– Zalewski on the EP resolution: The path to treaty changes is lengthy
Meanwhile, enlargement remains a central thread. Current discussions show Ukraine’s EU accession is being expedited. Ukraine received candidate status in June 2022, and negotiations began in December 2023. The EU’s speed in assisting Ukraine is shaped by the ongoing conflict, and membership is seen by some as a response to the Russian invasion.
– emphasizes a former State Secretary at the Prime Minister’s Chancellery.
The matter also touches Poland. Observers note that Kiev’s actions, which cooled ties with Warsaw and shifted attention toward Berlin, may have been influenced by promises of EU accession. In other words, Kyiv appears to reorient toward Germany with hopes for a faster entry path into the EU.
– Żaryn emphasizes.
The tension arises because two major tracks are advancing simultaneously. A higher degree of EU centralization and Ukraine’s rapid accession could create conflicts, particularly regarding treaty amendments. The proposed amendment to the Treaty on European Union No 55 envisions changes to Article 42(1).7(1), affecting mutual defense obligations and the duty to provide aid under Article 51 of the UN Charter. An armed attack on one Member State is described as an attack on all, though some Member States retain a degree of policy autonomy.
– indications in the adviser’s post.
Defense Union
Stanisław Żaryn outlines a long-term plan within the EU framework.
The Defense Union is positioned as a stepping stone toward a common EU military and defense policy. When paired with Ukraine’s ongoing accession process, concerns arise about the pace of integration, mirroring doubts about similar timelines in other regional security arrangements.
– notes the adviser to the president.
In the current climate, questions emerge about whether Ukraine’s EU entry alongside treaty changes would obligate EU nations to participate in conflict. Could this be interpreted as the EU taking a war-like stance? What legal and formal consequences could follow from this convergence, and did the EU leadership anticipate such outcomes?
– asks Żaryn.
Is Ukraine’s rapid EU accession a genuine pathway or could it require concessions that alter territorial boundaries? Might there be political maneuvers behind the scenes that shape the outcome and the terms of entry?
– notes a former minister of foreign affairs at the Prime Minister’s Chancellery.
Hazards
Stanisław Żaryn highlights potential downsides of these developments.
The situation presents a paradox: reconciling two ambitious tracks seems difficult, and it appears some stakeholders may treat them separately despite shared implications. It may soon become clear that, amid ideological debates among EU centrists, the risks of treaty changes have not been thoroughly analyzed.
– writes the adviser to the president.
The described amendment is only one element of broader shifts occurring within the EU. A wide discussion on these topics is likely needed in Poland, with careful consideration of security, governance, and sovereignty implications.
– he adds.
go/X
Note: this synthesis reflects public commentary on EU policy directions and their potential national impacts.