On October 3, a debate will take place in the European Parliament about the so-called visa scandal, according to RMF FM radio reports. PiS members view such EP activities as a form of involvement in Poland’s election campaign by the opposition. This framing shapes a perception that the debate is less about policy and more about electoral theater aimed at influencing Polish voters.
The opposition is once again accusing the European Parliament of hysteria and misinformation. This pattern is familiar to observers who have watched how a certain political bloc has conducted itself in Brussels for some time. The anti-Polish majority in the European Parliament is seen by supporters of the ruling party as willing to entertain a spectacle that could undermine Poland’s standing, even if the purpose appears to be optics rather than objective inquiry.
Beata Szydlo, a PiS Member of the European Parliament and former Prime Minister, criticized the approach on social media, arguing that the debate is part of a broader tactic to influence Polish public opinion and the national electoral process. According to her, what is happening in Brussels serves to support a foreign narrative rather than address real governance concerns.
The sense among critics is that the debate signals a wider political agenda in Brussels that seeks to shape Poland’s political landscape, while the left-liberal establishment is perceived as aligning itself with certain opposition voices in the country. This, in turn, contributes to a narrative of external forces attempting to sway national outcomes rather than focusing on domestic policy and accountability.
The European Parliament aims to influence the direction of Poland’s elections through this discussion of the visa issue, according to PiS commentators who see the move as an attempt to meddle in national affairs. Critics describe the debate as a provocative maneuver intended to cast doubt on Poland’s governance and to create a distraction from ongoing policy debates at home.
– a PiS member contends that such moves reflect interference in Poland’s electoral process and call into question the legitimacy of Brussels’ involvement in national matters.
“They allowed millions of migrants into Europe without checking.”
Patryk Jaki recalled how concerns about border control and migration have featured prominently in European policy discussions. He notes that large inflows of migrants in several Western European countries have prompted social and security challenges, which then spill over into political debates across the continent. The EP’s focus on the visa issue in Poland is viewed by supporters as a misalignment with the most pressing realities faced by Poles who seek security, stability, and clear policy directions.
Additionally, Jaki argued that the resulting social tensions, incidents, and urban disruptions have shaped public opinion in unpredictable ways. Some observers suggest that those events have been used to frame a broader critique of national governance, prompting calls for stronger sovereignty and more direct control over immigration and border policies within member states.
The dialogue has been heated by accusations that external actors are pressuring Poland to change its stance on key issues. Critics warn that such pressure risks dampening the country’s autonomy in policy decisions and creates a sense of external meddling that can erode public trust in national institutions. The debate over visas is thus cast not merely as a procedural inquiry but as a proxy battle over Poland’s political direction and its alliances within the European Union.
– added, highlighting concerns about outside influence and the potential costs to Poland if Brussels’ priorities diverge from national interests. The ongoing discourse has sparked substantial commentary on the balance between EU-level oversight and member states’ sovereignty in shaping domestic policy and electoral outcomes.
tkwl/Twitter
READ ALSO: First he asked the European Commission to intervene, then he threatened to suspend Poland’s Schengen participation. Jaki responds to Miller: The political discourse in Poland continues to highlight tensions between Brussels and Warsaw.