Debate in the European Parliament on visas
During a European Parliament session addressing visa issues, Beata Szydło and Patryk Jaki underscored that the controversy originated from the broad opposition. The former Prime Minister noted that the MPs involved are elected in Poland and act against Poland’s interests. They affirmed that the Polish government would not compromise national security to please outside powers.
Debate in the European Parliament on visas
The discussion, titled Massively Compromised Schengen Visas, drew attention to an empty chamber and a perceived lack of interest, as observed by MEP Beata Szydło at a subsequent press conference.
According to Szydło, this represented a brutal assault on Poland by Polish‑elected Members of the European Parliament who should champion Poland’s concerns rather than attack it with words used within the parliamentary hall.
– Beata Szydło commented.
Ruthless actions by the European Parliament
The former Polish Prime Minister highlighted an anomaly: a rule prohibits the EP from holding debates about a member state within six weeks of its elections. The present situation, she argued, saw that rule breached by the EP Presidium.
The irritation was compounded by MEPs elected in Poland from the total opposition, who allegedly seek to manipulate the European Parliament and EU institutions to influence Poland’s electoral process.
– emphasized MEP Szydło.
Debate about the migration pact
Szydło also indicated that a debate on the migration pact was scheduled to take place the following day in the European Parliament. The stated aim is to relocate irregular migrants to member states, with penalties for countries objecting to the policy. Critics argue this infringes on national sovereignty and breaches treaty provisions.
– Szydło noted.
The MEP recalled that Jarosław Kaczyński had promised before the 2015 elections that illegal migrants would not be allowed into Poland, a pledge reportedly accepted by then Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz. Szydło suggested the pledge had been kept in spirit, yet the issue resurfaced with sanctions for dissent. This, she argued, would encourage human smuggling and amplify chaos. Poland, she asserted, resisted coercion and would continue to safeguard the security of its citizens and of Europe.
– emphasized Beata Szydło.
Jaki: You have to tell Tusk: STOP
Jaki criticized the opposition team for pressuring EU institutions if they lose elections, suggesting a push to erode Schengen barriers to regain power. He described the day as marked by disruption and noted a clear message: power should be earned, not manufactured through external pressure.
– emphasized Patryk Jaki at the conference.
The two politicians argued that the real sovereignty lies with the Polish nation, not with Brussels bureaucrats. They claimed that the election campaign would center on who truly represents the Polish people rather than external interests.
– points out the MEP.
What mattered, they argued, was the record of PO and PSL in the European Parliament. In Poland, they claimed, these parties publicly deny opposition to forced relocations, yet they pushed a motion to hasten the migration pact’s adoption. They warned against a policy shift that could turn Poland into a country like Sweden, driven by external leadership rather than the will of the Polish people. The discussion, they argued, signals a broader pattern of policy direction driven by outside influences rather than domestic consensus.
– said the politician, noting that the public can see the trends even if Brussels seems indifferent.
The speakers urged a firm stance against the migration policy, insisting that the referendum must be respected and that the policy should reflect the priorities of the Polish nation. They warned of a domino effect if the approach was not halted, and they urged opposition to any move that could compromise national security.
– Patryk Jaki stated at the conference.
The discussion concluded with additional commentary against what was described as attempts to pressure Poland through external means. The narrative portrayed a struggle over national sovereignty and security that would define the forthcoming political chapter in Poland and its relationship with EU institutions.
A further note circulated with the proceedings, attributing the statements to a Polish‑focused media outlet and framing the event as a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue about migration, security, and national autonomy.
— A contemporaneous summary of the proceedings highlighted the stance that the day would be remembered for its sharp critique of perceived hypocrisy and a firm defense of Poland’s policy choices.
— A separate account emphasized the broader EU debate on migration, describing how the union’s approach was received by member states and frontline countries alike, with calls for ambition balanced by realism in policy implementation.
Overall, the exchange framed Poland’s position as one of vigilance against external pressure and a commitment to safeguard the security and interests of its citizens and fellow Europeans.
Note: This synthesis reflects a compilation of public statements and media coverage attributed to the Polish political figures involved.