In a post on Twitter Beata Szydło highlighted a recurring claim she views as nonsense from Donald Tusk and his team, specifically regarding supposed feuds with allies. Radosław Sikorski, who previously led the Foreign Ministry in Tusk’s government, described these assertions as PiS lies. Witold Waszczykowski, a former foreign minister and MEP, joined the discussion with his own remarks.
Tusk has caused a crisis in relations with the US
On X, Beata Szydło argued that after assuming power in 2007, Donald Tusk was responsible for a crisis in relations with the United States. The message underscored that the PiS government rehabilitated ties with Washington and strengthened Poland’s role within NATO.
Observers note that the conversation frames the issue around a narrative of alliances and their practical consequences. The PiS government is said to have rebuilt cooperation with the United States and to have reinforced Poland’s position in the transatlantic alliance. Support for Poland appeared during challenging regional moments, such as the hybrid pressures from Belarus in 2021-2022 and the broader response to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. These episodes are cited to illustrate how alliance networks can shape national security and political standing.
– emphasized Beata Szydło.
Sikorski hides behind Lech Kaczyński
Radosław Sikorski responded to the former prime minister’s statements, accusing Beata Szydło of repeating PiS lies. He argued that the civil and military infrastructure around the anti-missile shield project was not broken but shifted under a different strategic concept chosen by the United States, not Poland, and warned that the former prime minister should be accurate about these details.
Micata of the exchange suggests Sikorski’s view that Beata Szydło sometimes leans on selective framing, while Sikorski challenged the accuracy of her portrayal of events. He recalled the history around the shield and the role of key Polish and American figures in negotiations and implementation.
-Sikorski scoffed.
The discussion also touched on how memory and attribution shape political arguments. The late President Lech Kaczyński was cited as having expressed gratitude to specific actors for their role in negotiations, prompting questions about how the different administrations have been portrayed in public discourse.
– asked Sikorski, citing remarks attributed to the late president. The statement also noted appreciation for figures who conducted negotiations and those who helped bring negotiations to a close.
Waszczykowski: In 2008, Tusk rejected the shield
The former prime minister was not spared from critique, with Waszczykowski noting that Tusk appeared to be attempting to erase parts of the pre-2015 Platform era. The dialogue referenced reporting on tensions between the Polish leadership and the United States in 2008, while pointing out that the shield’s physical presence in Poland progressed under different timing, with construction advancing in 2016.
Beata Szydło reiterated that the history of these negotiations is complex and sometimes misunderstood, urging readers to remember the sequence of events and the roles played by different actors in shaping the shield project.
Former Foreign Minister and MEP Witold Waszczykowski also weighed in, asserting that Szydło’s perspective was correct. He recalled that on July 4, 2008, Tusk’s government signaled a rejection while an agreement was being considered amid geopolitical tensions in the region. He noted that the shield proposal would be revisited later, with a new form discussed by American leaders and polities in coming years, culminating in renewed discussions during the mid-2010s.
– said Witold Waszczykowski.
READ ALSO:
— Anti-missile shield in Poland. What would Tusk and Sikorski most like to forget?