The June CBOS survey explored what influenced voters in the European Parliament elections. Across parties, voters most often cited approval of the electoral program, alignment of views and values, and sympathy or support for a particular political option as the key reasons for their choice.
In the post-election phase, respondents were asked to name the motives behind voting for a specific European Parliament list. Among supporters of all groups, the top factors were satisfaction with the program, closeness of policy perspectives, and rapport with a particular political option. A notable share identified with the KO bloc as a whole, rating its candidates positively and expressing confidence in the group, while also noting its pro-European stance and opposition to PiS as influential motivators. Some voters admired the coalition for its democratic values and belief in the rule of law, and others hoped for positive changes or valued the potential impact on the country’s development. A smaller portion linked their choice to values such as democracy, rule of law, or a belief that KO would advance these priorities.
Among Law and Justice supporters, the party’s platform was a decisive driver for about a quarter of voters, followed by appreciation for the party’s performance in office and trust in its politicians. Patriotism and favorable views of candidates also played meaningful roles, with religious or traditional values influencing a smaller segment. A minority cited the lack of a viable alternative as a reason for their support.
Confederation supporters showed strong identification with the party, with euroscepticism accompanying concerns for Poland’s interests. This group generally opposed further European integration, the Green Deal, and migration, while prioritizing domestic economic issues and desiring a political change beyond the PiS and KO duo.
Third Way voters, often seen as centrist, were attracted by specific program ideas and expressed interest in solutions for the environment and climate. Voters who supported PSL and Poland 2050 emphasized the program positively, and a notable share of TD voters cited the difficulty of articulating a motive or highlighted a pragmatic, common-sense approach. Some pointed to a pro-environment stance as a reason for their choice.
Left-wing voters tended to identify strongly with the party and viewed its candidates positively. Supporters highlighted advocacy for LGBT rights and environmental protection, with a segment describing voting for the left as a strategic choice to oppose policies they disliked, and some aiming to influence changes in abortion law.
Overall, the explanations for voting in the June European Parliament elections reveal not only individual motivations for choosing MEPs but also broader patterns of support for the major political parties on the national stage.
– be on CBOS.
Pollsters described the KO electorate as pro-European and critical of PiS, with a clear emphasis on democratic values, the rule of law, and economic development as important priorities.
Law and Justice voters expressed appreciation for the eight years of governance, feeling the party’s policies benefited them, while highlighting patriotism and traditional values as core anchors.
– we are reading.
Confederation and Third Way voters
CBOS noted that Confederation supporters combine concern for Poland’s interests with Euroscepticism. They oppose further European integration, the Green Deal, and accepting migrants, while stressing economic issues and a desire for political renewal beyond the main parties.
Third Way supporters are seen as centrists seeking alternatives to the main parties, valuing moderation and practical solutions. Among their interests are environmental and climate protections. For left-wing voters, issues such as LGBT rights, ecological concerns, and access to abortion are key policy areas.
The study was conducted from June 10 to 20, 2024 with a representative sample of 1,055 adults drawn from the PESEL register, using a mixed-mode approach with various data collection methods to ensure broad coverage.
Source: wPolityce
Note: This summary reflects survey findings and the way different voter groups articulate their choices. Marked citations provide attribution to the CBOS report and related commentary.