The Armenian Foreign Ministry, led by Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, has emphasized ongoing efforts to bring international oversight to the Nagorno-Karabakh region and the Lachin corridor. In statements reported by TASS, Mirzoyan said that Armenia is actively seeking the deployment of United Nations and OSCE fact-finding missions to monitor developments in these sensitive areas. The aim, as described, is to gather independent information on the situation on the ground and support ongoing discussions about access and humanitarian needs in the region.
In related remarks, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan noted that the Azerbaijani authorities halted gas supplies to Nagorno-Karabakh on December 12 of the previous year. This assertion underscores the continuing challenges surrounding energy access and civilian welfare in the enclave, a matter frequently raised in regional diplomacy and security discussions. Armenian officials have framed the gas cut as part of broader pressures affecting civilians, while officials in Baku have offered competing explanations, highlighting the complexity of the dispute over control and security in the corridor area.
On the international front, a telephone conversation between Ilham Aliyev, the former President of Azerbaijan, and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has been reported as addressing the Lachin corridor and alleged violations by Armenia. The exchange occurred in a sequence of diplomatic contacts aimed at de-escalation and the pursuit of peace talks. The discussion reportedly touched on access, humanitarian corridors, and the roles of regional and international actors in facilitating dialogue between Yerevan and Baku.
Earlier, Blinken spoke with Prime Minister Pashinyan in a bid to support stalled peace initiatives with Azerbaijan. Those talks, described by officials as constructive, focused on stabilizing the Lachin corridor, ensuring the safety of civilians, and identifying avenues for credible engagement between the involved parties. The communications reflect a broader pattern of American engagement intended to bolster diplomacy and reduce the risk of miscalculation in a volatile section of the South Caucasus.
As Moscow, Brussels, and Washington all monitor the situation, Armenia has repeatedly called for transparent, international oversight to verify access conditions along the Lachin corridor and to document any violations connected to movement between Armenia and the territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenia asserts that such monitoring would help prevent humanitarian disruptions and build trust among communities affected by the dispute. Azerbaijan has stressed the importance of security assurances and the rights of its sovereign territory, arguing that any monitoring framework must respect its national sovereignty and border controls. The evolving diplomacy underscores the delicate balance of regional security interests and humanitarian concerns that drive ongoing negotiations in the South Caucasus.
Analysts note that the situation remains fragile, with multiple stakeholders including regional powers and international organizations seeking a stable and verifiable path toward peace. The exchange of information among states, international agencies, and Armenian and Azerbaijani authorities is likely to continue as negotiators explore mechanisms for safe passage, monitoring, and confidence-building measures. In this environment, the Lachin corridor and Nagorno-Karabakh will remain central to conversations about energy security, civilian protection, and long-term regional stability.