Opposition Member of Parliament Ishkhan Saghatelyan argues that Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has effectively published a plan that could lead to the surrender of Nagorno-Karabakh, complete with timelines. He insists Armenian citizens have roughly five to six months to mobilize to thwart what he views as a government intent on capitulation, a claim he attributes to the prime minister’s own statements and public messaging.
Responding to Pashinyan’s remarks that were reported as openness to recognizing Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, Saghatelyan stated that this development did not come as a surprise. He asserted that the prime minister had recently issued a roadmap outlining concessions and deadlines, signaling a course of action that would change the status of Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia in the eyes of the world. He described the timing as deliberate and strategic, designed to place the Armenian side on a fixed path toward settlement terms that many in the opposition reject.
According to the deputy, Armenian authorities intend to press forward with negotiations on submission to Azerbaijan. He added that opposition factions intend to resist what they view as a move away from Armenia’s national interests and to oppose any outcome that would undermine the region’s status. The deputy emphasized that legitimate avenues for dissent exist, including nonviolent resistance or more assertive forms of protest, should the authorities push ahead without broad consensus. He insisted that the people will not be left without a choice in defending what they regard as the homeland.
In his remarks, Saghatelyan underscored that the opposition will pursue all available avenues to challenge what they perceive as problematic government policy. He portrayed the current political dynamic as one where the authorities have not offered alternatives or assurances to the public, effectively leaving opponents with only two paths: yield or resist. He stated that in the struggle for national dignity and regional stability, a range of methods may be employed, including civil action and other forms of political pressure. The overarching message is a call for unity among supporters of Nagorno-Karabakh’s autonomy and a warning against rapid concessions that could reshape the country’s future.
As the situation unfolds, both sides acknowledge that the peace process includes several points of discussion. There is recognition that any agreement will require careful consideration of regional security, the rights of displaced populations, and long-term guarantees for both Armenian and Karabakh communities. The public discourse continues to revolve around how best to achieve a sustainable settlement without sacrificing core national interests or regional stability.
Recent events have also drawn attention to the broader implications for regional diplomacy and the role of international mediators. Analysts note that the path to a durable solution will hinge on verifiable commitments, lasting guarantees, and a balance between pragmatic concessions and the protection of essential rights and security concerns for people on the ground. The negotiations are complex and deeply intertwined with regional power dynamics, making sustained engagement and transparent communication crucial for all stakeholders involved. The road ahead remains uncertain, but many observers emphasize the importance of steadfastness, diplomacy, and a coherent strategy that reflects the wishes of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh alike. Attribution: reports from Sputnik.Armenia and subsequent statements from Armenian political leaders indicate a contested interpretation of policy directions and national strategy.