There are things that bother them because of their inconsistency. There is freedom of expression in Spain and in principle all people are respectable, although not all opinions are respectable, such as those who advocate racism. Sometimes there are also doubts about people when they are not consistent. This comes from the story of Mr. AgustÃn Santos, who until now was Spain’s permanent representative ambassador to the United Nations in New York, who criticizes the country who apparently appointed him under the pseudonym ‘Gustavo Buster’ several years to represent him. While defending Catalonia’s “right to self-determination” (?), there are “political prisoners” here, defending their interests with comments such as testing the Constitution and the Monarchy. There is an obvious contradiction here: Mr. Santos could have any opinion he wanted, that would be incomplete, but as long as he is in the position of ambassador to Spain, he should avoid criticizing him when he does the job for which we are paid. a salary each month consists precisely in representing and defending the Kingdom of Spain. I think he should have resigned first and then said what he wanted. Yes, I know that even the minister does not resign here, but in a normal country, it is necessary to demand responsibility from the person who proposes this and then from those who keep or keep him in place. Complicity if they knew, incompetence if they were unaware. And after that, second on Yolanda DÃaz’s list for Madrid in the next election, let him say what he wants, including the other contradiction of calling himself a leftist and defending not equality among Spaniards, but identity elitist beach bars. And whoever wants to vote for him. While I dislike his ideas, I do not criticize his public expression (even under a pseudonym) as the Spanish ambassador.
Therefore, in order not to be sad, I prefer to listen to good news such as the mother of four children who disappeared for forty days in the Colombian jungles, the pilot and another passenger were found after a plane crash in which they lost their lives. . The eldest is 13, the youngest is 11 months, and he completed the first year of his protected life in the arms of his older sisters. It seems impossible. They found them dehydrated and covered in mosquito bites but alive, but the important thing is that after wandering in the dark in a forest where the sun’s rays did not penetrate, drenched by the constant rains that kept their clothes from drying out, surrounded by jaguars and snakes feeding on plants and fruits that they separated from poisonous ones because they were natives born in the same forest. . If I had an eleven-month-old girl in my arms, I’m sure I wouldn’t be able to survive. Although the stories of Emilio Salgari or Robinson Crusoe filled my childhood dreams, as Lord of the Flies later impressed me, this time it was more about leadership than the jungle and never believed in myths of the “noble savage”. It is typical of “enlightened” armchairs who want to believe in human goodness, while a creaking guillotine below in the square assures them the opposite. Fortunately, the story of these children ends well, and the thirteen-year-old sister is admirable, as are those who never gave up and kept searching when they doubted they had found them alive as time went on. It looks like the boys need to find Wilson, the dog determined to locate him and who also disappeared at the last minute.
There are other good stories these days, like the one that lets a paralyzed person clumsily get up and walk, where the mental signals that are connected to a cord from their brain to their spinal cord, ordering them to move, reach their brains. legs. I can imagine the flow of hope this will create among the many young people who are confined to wheelchairs—not so young. It’s changing their lives!
Stories about struggle and overcoming seemingly insurmountable obstacles, giving us hope in the face of inconsistencies, smallness, and the daily problems that plague us, big or small, because we have no right to complain as soon as we look around.
Source: Informacion
Dolores Johnson is a voice of reason at “Social Bites”. As an opinion writer, she provides her readers with insightful commentary on the most pressing issues of the day. With her well-informed perspectives and clear writing style, Dolores helps readers navigate the complex world of news and politics, providing a balanced and thoughtful view on the most important topics of the moment.