The newspaper library often contains surprises that the established powers try to make us forget because they reveal the truth. The double measure of the West.
in his edition 14 August 2004, Newspaper New York Times He reported that Ukraine is one of the most active countries in sending troops to the unit that participated in the illegal invasion of Iraq by the USA.
Ukraine then sent 5,000 troops there to help the superpower invade and destroy a sovereign nation that Washington disliked its government.
This gesture of solidarity from Kiev was praised by the then US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who thanked the US for its “excellent support” of its military action against “terrorists”.
Now Ryan McMacken, the communications director of the Institute named after one of the fathers of the Austrian school of economics, Ludwig von Mises, and the author of several books, reminds us of all this.
Located in Auburn, Alabama, this center of study follows that economist’s intellectual tradition and advocates, among other things, the least possible government intervention, a market economy, very lax regulation, and also very low taxation, namely capitalism, pure and simple. .
Thus, the article published by its director, McMacken, on the war in Ukraine is surprising, claiming, for example, that the United States has applied the same approach to other wars there with smaller countries unable to react.
And just as in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, the government in Washington advocated a “regime change” in Russia without considering whether the worse would come after Putin.
According to McMacken, Americans, for example, World War II. As in Japan at the end of World War II, the complete defeat of the enemy is difficult to swallow a pill that does not mean “unconditional surrender.”
But the reality is that most conflicts result in negotiated solutions, and in the opinion of the director of the Mises Institute, this is what will result in Ukraine as well.
McMacken explains that a Russian defeat, which meant the complete abandonment of the occupied territory, never happened.
Washington tried to present NATO’s military response to the Russian invasion as a “moral crusade,” but failed to completely isolate the country from Vladimir Putin.
Despite strong pressure from Washington, the leaders of most countries in the so-called global South have not shown their willingness to “impoverish their population” simply to please the US government.
The resistance in following Washington on this issue stems from the fact that many countries are convinced that expressions such as “respect for national sovereignty or international law” are not sincere.
The US has demonstrated this with its attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. McMacken argues that Washington has no interest in violating national sovereignty if it advances its ambitions.
What the US calls a “rules-based international order” makes no sense when it is offensive to its government.
McMacken believes we are getting closer to a possible negotiated solution to a conflict that should have been avoided and has cost tens of thousands of lives and completely destroyed a nation’s wealth.
Source: Informacion
Dolores Johnson is a voice of reason at “Social Bites”. As an opinion writer, she provides her readers with insightful commentary on the most pressing issues of the day. With her well-informed perspectives and clear writing style, Dolores helps readers navigate the complex world of news and politics, providing a balanced and thoughtful view on the most important topics of the moment.