Singer Lolita Milyavskaya addressed the recent buzz around Nastya Ivleeva’s controversial party, saying there is no reason to cancel performances after attending the event labeled as a naked party. The remarks were shared in a interview with the online outlet Paragraf, and they reflect a stance focused on professional duty and personal autonomy rather than public pressure or scandal.
From Milyavskaya’s perspective, there is no justification to halt concerts. She asserted that she did not break any laws and that organizers or promoters who decide to cancel should do so if they wish. She also highlighted that she holds a retirement certificate, implying a long career and a degree of stability that makes her less reactive to online noise. Her reaction suggests a belief that public controversy should not derail a performer’s commitment to work, and she hinted at legal recourse if the situation escalates into something more damaging. These comments came as part of a broader conversation about artistic expression and the responsibilities artists bear when their actions are publicly scrutinized. Paragraf noted that the singer remained calm and focused on her craft rather than letting the controversy dictate her schedule.
The interview also touched on the singer’s comfort with her own choices at the party. Milyavskaya conveyed that she did not feel shame about her behavior during the gathering, emphasizing a personal sense of freedom and artistry rather than conforming to external judgments. The conversation reflected a broader discussion about how artists navigate public ethics, personal boundaries, and the expectations of fans and critics alike. Paragraf highlighted her stance as one of self-assurance and ongoing professional engagement, not withdrawal or retreat from the stage.
Earlier in December, Milyavskaya addressed reports that some colleagues were calling for her removal from New Year’s Eve performances in response to Ivleeva’s event. She reiterated that Ivleeva’s party should be viewed as a work of art and that the creative impulse behind such events can resonate with audiences who crave bold, provocative expressions. She also acknowledged that many peers were exhausted by the year and perhaps seeking a break, while she chose to maintain her schedule and approach disputes with a sense of irony rather than surrendering to public pressure. The exchange underscores how artists balance criticism with their professional commitments, often choosing to respond with humor or steadfast purpose rather than public fealty to popular sentiment.
The party in question was held at the Mutabor club on December 20, with a dress code that encouraged guests to arrive in a minimal or semi-nude state. Among the attendees were notable names such as Ksenia Sobchak, Olga Orlova, Philip Kirkorov, Glukoza, Lolita Milyavskaya, Oksana Samoilova, rapper Vacio, and Dzhigan. While the event drew significant media attention and public debate for its explicit theme, Ivleeva faced sharp criticism from segments of the public for pushing boundaries in a live social setting. The organizers defended the concept as a form of artistic expression and a conversation-starter about contemporary norms, and they argued that art can provoke discussion and reflection. The incident catalyzed discussions about artistic risk, audience tolerance, and the evolving standards of celebrity culture in contemporary media landscapes. Paragraf summarized the mixed reception and the ongoing debate about where art ends and provocation begins.
In the wake of the uproar, public figures and commentators weighed in, with many reflecting on how celebrity culture intersects with freedom of expression, personal boundaries, and the responsibilities that come with influence. The narrative around the naked party illustrates a broader trend in how society negotiates provocative performances, the boundaries of aesthetic experimentation, and the impact of online discourse on a performer’s career. As the conversation continues, the emphasis remains on the resilience of artists who choose to stay active and to engage with audiences while navigating the pressures that accompany high-profile public life.