Ivleeva, Kirkorov and the Naked Party Controversy: A Closer Look
The controversy surrounding a December gathering brought sharp attention to Anastasia Ivleeva, the well known blogger and TV presenter, and Philip Kirkorov, a revered People’s Artist of Russia. The event drew in a range of celebrities and sparked a flurry of comments across social media and Telegram channels. This account follows the timeline, the claims, and the public reactions that followed, aiming to present a clear picture of what happened and how it was received by fans and critics alike.
The party took place on December 20, 2023, and the dress code required attendees to arrive half-naked. The guest list included high profile names such as Ksenia Sobchak, Olga Orlova, Philip Kirkorov, Glukoza, Lolita Milyavskaya, Oksana Samoilova, and two rappers, Vacio and Dzhigan. The event drew intense scrutiny from viewers and entertainment media, with many voices criticizing the choice of theme and the conduct of those who attended. As coverage circulated, the spotlight rested not only on the guests but also on the broader questions raised about celebrity style and public propriety in social settings.
Ivleeva posted a photograph that showed handmade earrings shaped like a mouse, a playful nod that she used to signal a lighthearted gesture tied to Kirkorov. In the same post, she hinted that the crafted decoration might be a gift for the People’s Artist of Russia, a detail that fed the surrounding chatter. At one point Ivleeva commented to a Telegram outlet, asking, “Does anyone know if Kirkorov’s ears were pierced?” The remark drew further attention to the social dynamics between Ivleeva and Kirkorov and sparked discussions about the boundaries of satire and tribute in celebrity culture.
The Telegram channel Tatler’s Hero joined the discussion by posing a question about whether the star believed Kirkorov bore responsibility for the troubles that followed the party. Ivleeva offered a cheeky reply, joking, “No, it’s all Biden’s fault,” a line that circulated widely and added a layer of mockery to the online discourse. The exchange underscored how humor and provocation can intensify public perception during such incidents, especially when it involves prominent figures with loyal fan bases and strong media followings.
In November, Kirkorov addressed the situation, stating that he had not reached out to Ivleeva after the event. He explained that he expected an apology from the blogger but did not receive one. He contended that the fallout from the scandal affected him most, insisting that Ivleeva was present at the party but reacted in a way that shifted the focus away from other moments. This perspective highlighted the lingering tension between the two public figures and underscored how different parties perceived the meaning and consequences of the night’s events.
The December gathering drew a chorus of critics who questioned the judgment of those who attended and the overall mood of the evening. The dress code, described as revealing, plus the list of attendees, prompted discussions about celebrity culture, artistic status, and the boundaries between performance and personal conduct. Critics argued that such parties risk trivializing serious artistic achievements while inviting sensational coverage that can overshadow constructive dialogue about the arts and public life.
Earlier, Prokhor Chaliapin came to Ivleeva’s defense, expressing support for her position and contributing to the public discussion surrounding the incident. His intervention added another voice to a debate that had already become highly polarized among fans and commentators. The episode served as a reminder of how quickly celebrity narratives can shift online, with statements and counterstatements shaping the ongoing public perception of the figures involved.
Looking back, observers note that the event became a touchstone for conversations about celebrity influence, accountability, and the role of humor in media storytelling. It highlighted how social media amplifies every gesture at a high-profile gathering and how audiences assess intent, taste, and propriety in the glare of public scrutiny. As conversations continue, the incident remains a reference point for discussions about how stars navigate personal moments that become public spectacles and how fans interpret the ever-evolving dynamics of fame.