Lolita Milyavskaya on Ivleeva, Sobchak, and the aftereffects of the party controversy

No time to read?
Get a summary

Singer Lolita Milyavskaya recently disclosed that her communications with blogger Anastasia Ivleeva did not halt in the wake of a highly publicized party controversy. The singer shared these reflections in a long interview with News World, offering a rare glimpse into the personal and professional ripple effects of the incident.

According to Milyavskaya, relationships with Ivleeva and with Ksenia Sobchak remained intact on a human level. She stated that neither Ivleeva nor Sobchak became estranged from her; the ties were not severed during the fallout. The artist emphasized that she bears no grudges toward Ivleeva, noting that Ivleeva was a public figure at the party and not its organizer, a distinction that she believes matters in how the situation is perceived.

During the interview, Milyavskaya described the pressure she faced as the scandal unfolded. She admitted that she had to conceal from her 81-year-old mother the fact that concert schedules in Russia began to be canceled in the aftermath of the controversy. Yet she also highlighted resilience within her family circle: her daughter understood the seriousness of the moment and did not abandon her, a small beacon of support amid the turbulence. The singer also recalled receiving solidarity from colleagues who stood by her during the ordeal.

Reflecting on the public response, Milyavskaya recalled walking the streets with a sense that some people were photographing her and others offered cruel remarks, yet she wondered about the volume of hatred online. She remarked that she had not encountered any of those individuals in person, suggesting a disconnect between online hostility and real-world encounters. This contrast underscored a broader conversation about how social media amplifies backlash, sometimes far beyond what is seen in one-on-one interactions.

In the wake of the cancellations, a company linked to Lolita faced financial repercussions because salaries were not paid to its employees due to the halt in performances. Milyavskaya made a point of noting that she continued to compensate her band and crew during the months when touring across the country was halted. Her stance illustrated a commitment to the people who worked with her, even as concert opportunities dried up due to the scandal and its consequences for the industry at large.

Meanwhile, activists and commentators continued to discuss related developments. In another ongoing thread, Borodin—an activist—reported that processes surrounding the formal recognition of Pugacheva as a foreign agent had begun, adding another layer to the broader discourse surrounding the affair and its surrounding personalities. The interconnected nature of these developments reflects how public figures, media narratives, and political procedures can intertwine in the aftermath of a high-profile event, shaping perceptions and the texture of ongoing coverage in the entertainment sphere.
Source attribution: News World.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Sweden’s stance on Ukrainian training and its European security role

Next Article

Russia Sees No Shortage of Foreign Veterinary Medicines Amid Growing Domestic Production