A recent survey explored opinions on who should lead the ruling party as its presidential candidate in the upcoming Polish elections set for spring 2025. The study asked respondents to name the person they believe would best represent PiS in the presidency and to share their thoughts on potential alternatives.
Participants named a mix of familiar political figures and public figures connected to PiS or its circle. The list included Mariusz Błaszczak, Przemysław Czarnek, Jarosław Kaczyński, Marek Magierowski, Marcin Mastalerek, Mateusz Morawiecki, Julia Przyłębska, Beata Szydło and Zbigniew Ziobro. While several names appeared, a large portion of respondents—nearly half—admitted they did not have a clear opinion on who should be PiS’s presidential candidate. A notable share suggested that a different politician not listed in the survey should be chosen.
Among the indicated options, Mateusz Morawiecki received the highest level of support, capturing a little over 10 percent of the responses. Following Morawiecki, Mariusz Błaszczak attracted around 4 percent of mentions. Beata Szydło drew roughly 3.5 percent of the responses. Przemysław Czarnek and Jarosław Kaczyński each trailed behind with about 3.3 percent and 3.1 percent respectively. Marcin Mastalerek drew 2.6 percent, and Zbigniew Ziobro was named by about 2.3 percent. Julia Przyłębska appeared in 1.6 percent of the responses, with Marek Magierowski at about 1.5 percent.
The profile of the respondents influenced the results in small but noticeable ways. Individuals earning between PLN 2,001 and PLN 3,000 net per month and residents of larger cities tended to view Mateusz Morawiecki as the strongest potential PiS presidential candidate more often than other groups. In contrast, higher education levels slightly reduced the share of respondents who favored Morawiecki, with 16 percent among those with primary or lower secondary education, and 9 percent among respondents with higher education. These patterns suggest a nuanced mix of opinions across income brackets, urbanization levels, and educational attainment.
Insights were provided by a senior project manager involved in the study, who commented on the data and its implications for the party’s presidential prospects. The survey was carried out using an online panel and polled a representative slice of adults aged 18 and older. The sampling reflects the opinions of eight hundred internet users who participated in the questionnaire at the turn of January and February of the cited year.
Readers may also encounter related questions about political leadership in 2025, including which candidates have the best chances to win and how public opinion trends are shaping party strategies. The broader discussion touches on leadership visibility, policy stances, and how party branding intersects with voter sentiment as the election cycle advances. The narratives around these potential candidates reflect the evolving priorities of voters and the strategic considerations of party stakeholders.
Notes on methodology and framing accompany the results. The data are attributed to an independent research panel and presented with the understanding that opinions can shift as campaigns unfold and events evolve. In examining such polls, observers weigh sample size, demographic reach, and response consistency to gauge how representative the findings might be of wider public opinion.
For readers seeking context, additional coverage highlights questions about who has the best chance of securing the presidency in 2025. Other discussions explore candidate trajectories, public reception, and how various political personalities resonate with different segments of the electorate.
End of summary. [Citation: SW Research] [Citation: Poll results presented to a national audience] [Citation: Online survey data on political leadership in 2023 study period]