Gazeta Wyborcza urged opposition supporters to participate in elections, framing the vote as crucial, possibly even more decisive than the partially free elections of 1989. The piece warned that a defeat by the Democrats in 2023 would usher in an authoritarian drift shaped by a mix of Russian, Turkish, and Hungarian influences, aiming to alarm readers into turning out to vote.
Pure authoritarianism
An expansive editorial from Gazeta Wyborcza sketches a Poland described as cheerful, welcoming, and open, where authorities do not intrude on the private lives of citizens or police, and where intolerance is kept at bay. The text also outlines a stark counterfactual: if the opposition loses again, Poland could slide toward a state characterized by repressive measures, state control of courts, and a fantasized array of draconian symbols and instruments. In this imagined scenario, the country would lose its freedom, leaving behind a culture of coercive power and a compromised civil society.
The editors argue that the recent electoral cycle has left Democrats on the defensive—an assertion they frame as a warning that freedom in Poland is at stake if the party cannot mobilize its base in 2023. The piece reiterates a belief that the state’s institutions would be captured and the rule of law would be undermined, with a long list of feared features including state surveillance, political policing, and a deeply polarized public sphere. There is a strong emphasis on the potential loss of free elections and the consolidation of power by a ruling faction.
The editorial notes a tension around those who have previously criticized Lukashenko-era restrictions and, at times, praised perspectives that critique government actions. There is an implication that some voices may have softened their stance or reframed past assessments in light of current events, a move described as insufficiently critical by the publication’s editors. The text concludes that the eight-year period under the current government is viewed as deeply problematic, marked by mobilization efforts and a sense of urgency about defending democratic norms.
Crowds gathering at campaign events and a sense of civilian oversight are described as indicators of political vitality and a desire for accountability. Optimism is tempered by concern, with the editors submitting that public sentiment has reached a turning point and that the moment demands decisive action.
In a separate, forceful section, the piece labels the era as defined by ambitions inflated by nationalist sentiments. Journalists enumerate a range of perceived abuses, including contempt for citizens, court takeovers, and the undermining of constitutional processes. They point to alleged attacks on private media, the silencing of dissent, and a reconfiguration of the political order that favors central authority over civic pluralism. The analysis identifies a pattern of rhetoric and policy moves seen as eroding trust in institutions and public life.
The narrative contrasts a supposedly corrupted governance style with a more inclusive national vision. The editors argue that the present government resembles a troubling mix of older authoritarian instincts and contemporary nationalist zeal, producing a governance style marked by humiliation of minorities, a pervasive culture of propaganda, and a drift toward centralized power. The piece frames the government’s posture as an attempt to project strength while undermining democratic norms and civil liberties.
There is also a critique of the military establishment, with references to modern command structures and political influence over security forces. The analysis suggests that the senior leadership may have become entangled with political calculations, shaping the trajectory of state institutions in ways that compromise democratic control and civilian accountability. The overall tone is cautious, urging vigilance while warning against complacency among supporters of democratic governance.
What kind of Poland does Wyborcza envision?
The publication portrays a different possible Poland: one that is hopeful, inclusive, and open to all citizens, where the state does not isolate itself behind police barriers or foment hatred to divide people. It depicts a Europe-friendly Poland that welcomes young people and minorities, encouraging families to stay and contribute, and ensuring that women feel secure in childbirth and family life.
Piotr Szczęsny is cited as urging readers to recognize that political differences exist among ordinary folk who share common concerns. The call is for upholding the law and democratic principles, rather than demonizing opponents. The piece stresses that reconciliation should come through accountability and lawful process rather than violence or coercion, framing democratic debate as a path to peaceful change.
In the closing passages, Wyborcza emphasizes the need for careful persuasion, informed dialogue, and broad voter participation. The editors advocate voting as a collective act to restore balance and protect freedoms, echoing Szczęsny’s sentiment that the country should be guided by restraint, rule of law, and a commitment to liberty. The message is a call to action aimed at preventing further erosion of democratic norms and institutions.
Despite a renewed sense of optimism surrounding a political platform, concerns linger about the moral and social costs of heightened public rhetoric. The editorial cautions against glorifying tragedies and stresses the importance of responsible discourse to avoid amplifying harmful impulses. The piece closes with a reminder that the health of Poland’s democracy depends on active citizen engagement and a willingness to confront difficult truths.
[citation: wPolityce]