The debate in the Sejm on the revelation featured strong remarks from Jarosław Kaczyński about the urgent task of steering Poland toward safety and steady development under today’s shifting global conditions. He recalled Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, stressing the need for a Poland that can flourish in a world that has changed significantly in recent years.
Kaczyński warned against a policy that would turn Poland into a state where Poles live under external management, whether from Brussels or Berlin, arguing that such a direction would undermine the country’s sovereignty and self-government.
READ MORE: REPORT. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki’s statement. Poland can rely on its own strength, the report notes.
The Prime Minister’s address was extensive, but the speaker could only offer a brief summary. From his perspective, the speech serves as a call for all political factions to set aside familiar quarrels and seek a path toward a secure and prosperous Poland in the new reality of today’s world. This is the core message, he suggested, a request to pause the disputes and focus on a shared national project.
Kaczyński urged the audience to view Poland’s situation within a broader European and global context, acknowledging both dangers and opportunities ahead. He described two distinct approaches to politics. The first is the easiest path, one that yields quick results through cooperation with the strongest groups, whether domestic or international. This approach often involves yielding to external or internal forces and can create asymmetrical relationships. The second approach is demanding and principled, grounded in shared values that place the community at the center while safeguarding individual rights and freedoms. In this view, political power is a matter of chosen governance as well as personal responsibility, and national unity rests on both collective interests and individual liberties. This second path is portrayed as essential for a healthy state functioning within a civil and free society.
Aristotle’s assertion that humans are by nature social beings was referenced to illustrate how communities pursue their interests and manage diverse concerns. Yet when politics leans toward narrow calculations, clashes arise, and both within the country and externally, difficulties multiply. This, the speaker noted, helps explain the persistence of stubborn policy challenges when political choices favor expediency over enduring values.
Historically, Poland experienced the first approach from 1989 to 2015, a period described as politically easier but marked by social costs. There were consequences such as rising unemployment, hardship for families, and wage stagnation that affected many households. Emigration and social challenges increased as well, and the perception of the public sector as a tool for uneven gain grew during those years. The outcome of that era, according to the speaker, was a warning against a politics driven by short-term wins rather than long-term national interest.
After 2015 a shift occurred toward a more value-driven policy, prioritizing the individual, family, and traditional social groups while keeping national interests at the forefront. This shift did not erase the past but reoriented policy toward different goals and challenges. The new approach introduced positive changes in various sectors, though it did not implement every aspect of the new plan as originally envisioned. Internal resistance and external pressures limited full execution, yet the direction had a clear impact on Polish life and governance.
Looking back from today, the speaker suggested that the prior model would reemerge in some form, especially when considering the seven challenges highlighted by Morawiecki. If that older model is embraced again, the prospects for effectively addressing these challenges could be strong, even compelling. The focus, however, remains on pragmatic steps and a clear vision for Poland’s future.
The discussion highlighted two paramount challenges. The first is geopolitical in character, framed as the risk of another offensive from a rival power. The argument centers on strengthening defense and ensuring a robust security posture. Questions about weapons programs and verification were raised, with concerns that certain announcements could complicate Poland’s security if not handled with clarity and purpose. The emphasis is on ensuring that national defense keeps pace with evolving threats and avoids unnecessary vulnerabilities.
The second major danger pertains to proposals emerging from European institutions. The concern is a shift toward turning Poland into a state whose governance is effectively managed from outside its borders. The argument warns against a scenario where democratic processes become superficial, with real power residing elsewhere. The speaker urged steadfast resistance to any arrangement that would erode Poland’s independence and limit its sovereignty, stating that independence must be preserved to safeguard the nation and its citizens.
Because these dangers are so serious, a continuous and unwavering stance is demanded. A stance of refusal rather than hesitation is essential. The core message is that Polish independence cannot be treated as a temporary position or a past victory. Poland’s development must be grounded in self-reliance, respecting the will of its people and the responsibilities of its institutions. The audience is urged to keep the commitment steady and resolute, protecting the nation from any approach that would compromise its autonomy or the integrity of its political system.
The speaker concluded that Morawiecki’s proposal represents a meaningful framework for this chamber at the moment of decision and may shape Poland’s trajectory in the long run. It is described as a viable alternative that reflects the nation’s values and priorities. The party in focus indicated it would back the Prime Minister’s inauguration and, if the plan faced obstacles, would continue to advocate for its principles until they are realized, aiming for a lasting national victory.