The Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov indicated that discussions about the peacekeeping mission in Nagorno-Karabakh will be on the agenda when Moscow engages with Baku. He spoke with journalists about the topic, underscoring that the question is a matter for the forthcoming talks and that no premature conclusions could be offered on its behalf.
“It is unlikely that any single party can provide a definitive answer at this moment, but the subject will be addressed during the meeting with Azerbaijan,” Peskov stated. The remark reflects the broader attempt to synchronize positions among involved parties and to outline the practical steps that may accompany any future deployment or approval process.
Earlier reports had suggested that Azerbaijan is prepared to grant access to international observers, including UN experts, to enter Nagorno-Karabakh. If confirmed, this would mark a notable shift, given the region has long been closed to independent reporting and on-site verification by international actors. Authorities in Baku have purportedly signaled their willingness to allow an international group of UN experts to enter the area within a short timeframe, a move seen by many as a potential step toward increased transparency and monitoring.
In parallel, Peter Stano, the chief spokesperson for the European Union’s diplomatic service, conveyed that the bloc is prepared to provide additional humanitarian aid to residents of Nagorno-Karabakh, with a proposed package amounting to 5 million euros. Stano emphasized the EU’s call for unimpeded international access, insisting that independent observers must be able to monitor the situation on the ground to deliver an impartial assessment of conditions and needs.
These developments come as international diplomacy continues to press for a durable diplomatic resolution to the dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh. The discussions involving Russia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, and allied actors are part of a broader effort to establish a stable framework that can support civilian protection, humanitarian relief, and confidence-building measures among the communities affected by the clash of interests in the region. Observers and analysts note that any credible peacekeeping arrangement would require robust verification mechanisms and continuous reporting to ensure accountability and trust among all parties involved.
Officials have indicated that the possibility of international engagement in Nagorno-Karabakh remains contingent on a range of political and security considerations, including the terms of deployment, the status of personnel, and the coordination with local authorities. While the exact structure of any mission is not yet clear, the emphasis remains on balancing security guarantees with the rights and freedoms of residents who have faced disruption and displacement in recent years. The dialogue among Moscow, Baku, and other stakeholders will likely define practical steps, timelines, and safeguards that could shape the next phase of international involvement in the region.
Experts cautioned that while avenues for monitoring can improve transparency, they also demand careful political alignment to avoid undermining local governance or triggering unintended escalations. The ongoing conversation signals a willingness by various players to explore concrete measures that can accompany or complement any peacekeeping framework, including humanitarian corridors, monitoring missions, and mechanisms for reporting incidents. In this context, the international community’s attention remains focused on how to translate diplomatic language into verifiable actions on the ground, with the aim of alleviating the suffering of civilians and creating the space for dialogue and reconciliation.