An official reported that the new head of the Sejm Chancellery issued the instruction to deactivate the parliamentary access cards belonging to him and to Mariusz Kamiński. Citing these remarks, Professor Sławomir Cenckiewicz highlighted a significant point about the episode.
The same source indicated that Cichocki backed the decision to deactivate the parliamentary cards. It was noted that the current head of the Sejm Chancellery previously coordinated special services in the government coalition, underscoring a political lineage that raised questions about the decision-making process.
The head of the Sejm Chancellery, Jacek Cichocki, reportedly ordered the deactivation of the parliamentary access cards in question. It was recalled that in 2009 Cichocki held a role coordinating special services within the PO-PSL government and supported the move to remove Kamiński after an inquiry into a gambling scandal uncovered by the authorities.
Observers are continuing to monitor the exchange of statements and the implications for the balance of power. The discussion signals deeper concerns about how security and parliamentary privileges are managed by the executive branch.
Cenckiewicz’s response
Sławomir Cenckiewicz offered commentary on the statements attributed to Wąsik. The historian drew attention to Cichocki’s involvement during the PO-PSL administration and the potential impact on ongoing inquiries and public trust.
Questions were raised about Cichocki’s role in alleged procedural violations relating to the cooperation between intelligence and security bodies, as described in official disclosures from the security oversight bodies in recent years. Several forthcoming publications are anticipated to address related topics, with researchers emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency rather than sensationalism.
The broader debate continues as experts stress the importance of safeguarding procedural integrity within security-adjacent institutions while avoiding unverified claims. Analysts note that ongoing investigations and public discourse must remain grounded in documented facts and official reports, rather than conjecture.
Further discussion is expected as parliamentary insiders, reform advocates, and historians weigh in with analyses that clarify lines of responsibility and the proper channels for addressing concerns about security coordination and executive influence. The goal is to ensure that norms governing collaboration between agencies and government bodies are respected and reinforced.
READ ALSO: Officials’ cards are deactivated amid concerns about state authority and civil liberties. Experts caution against rapid conclusions and stress the importance of verifying information through official channels and independent oversight.
[Citation: wPolityce]