The Swedish Ministry of Justice has publicly addressed five separate requests from the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation regarding the investigations into the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 pipelines. Reports from TASS, citing a diplomatic source in New York, indicate that Sweden’s response to a request for international legal assistance in the criminal inquiry stressed that fulfilling Russia’s demands could jeopardize Sweden’s national security. On that basis, the petitions were declined.
Similarly, it is reported that Germany’s authorities issued a response to a comparable request. The document copy notes that at this time a joint incident investigation team cannot be formed and that no physical evidence can be provided. The source emphasizes that this situation is now clear and documented, suggesting that Denmark, Germany, and Sweden may have given the Russian side information about the investigation’s progress that does not align with the actual state of events.
In the aftermath, statements attributed to Maria Zakharova, a former spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, are mentioned. The narrative asserts that there is an urgent need for a United Nations Security Council resolution to establish an independent commission to investigate the Nord Stream explosions. The call underscores a broader demand for external, transparent accountability and for interim steps that could facilitate a credible international review of the incidents.
Observers note that the complexity of the case involves multiple jurisdictions with evolving legal and geopolitical considerations. Officials across involved nations have repeatedly emphasized the importance of safeguarding internal security interests while exploring avenues for collaboration that might advance the search for answers. The dialogue highlights ongoing tensions between pursuing investigation objectives and managing diplomatic responsibilities, as parties weigh the best path toward clarity without compromising broader security concerns.
Analysts suggest that the unfolding exchanges reflect a broader pattern in which states seek to balance domestic law enforcement priorities with international oversight mechanisms. The discourse centers on the feasibility of independent, cross-border investigative structures and the role of international bodies in providing impartial scrutiny. The situation remains fluid, with government channels continuing to evaluate potential options that could satisfy both legal obligations and public accountability imperatives.