Let’s imagine that the crown falls on a dry, cold, overly formal person who does not stand out for his kindness or empathy. Don’t look at La Zarzuela, because The Guardian’s World War II. The traits he attributed to Elizabeth, despite such obvious shortcomings, “won and retained the support and affection of the overwhelming majority of the English public.” The hasty conclusion would decide that anyone could conquer his people from the throne. To rectify this, it should be noted right away that the deceased British Queen is not contagious, and those who interpret the enthusiasm after her disappearance as a sign that being king is already up to her standards have never been more wrong.
Carlos III is hastily crowned at the age when Juan Carlos I abdicated the throne of Spain, now is not the time to decide whether to abdicate or overthrow. Eight years after the change, only the courtiers who created the disgrace of the father, his son VI. Contrary to what is preached, II. Elizabeth’s death shows how difficult it is to reign. The first condition is constant scrutiny by the tabloids, the Labor press and the headlines of Rupert Murdoch. Only this crucible solidified her current figure as the queen of the people, suicidal submission is still preferred at the court of Madrid.
II. Isabel died while crowned, and the paradox that she was such an impressive queen that she sucked the juice of soot to the point of ending her planetary suffering can be fulfilled. If it’s the original queen, any heir will be disappointing. Therefore, at the same time II. Isabel’s extinction and III. If the miracle is difficult in London with a precedent of merit, imagine the problems of strengthening the dynasty of Juan Carlos I. The world wonders whether the death of the monarch or the monarchy occurred.
Source: Informacion
Ben Stock is a business analyst and writer for “Social Bites”. He offers insightful articles on the latest business news and developments, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the business world.