In the ongoing discussion about Spain’s latest legal reforms, the Community spokesperson for justice, Christian Wigand, told Europa Press that while they are tracking the developments closely, they do not offer comments on the invoices tied to the legislation. The spokesperson framed the matter as part of a broader assessment that the Community Commission undertakes about rule of law health across member states. This annual evaluation, produced by the Community services, is typically issued in July and provides an overall view of how democratic institutions are functioning within each country. Wigand emphasized that the Community executive does not preempt national decisions and that the evaluation remains focused on the rule of law rather than on the specifics of any one piece of legislation.
Further, Wigand refrained from making a judgment on the current situation while noting that the Community approach to reform is anchored in the framework of constitutional governance. He also commented on the ongoing Amparo appeal filed by the Partido Popular before the Constitutional Court. The aim of this legal action is to halt the Cortes from voting on changes designed to ease the renewal process of the entities responsible for guaranteeing judicial independence. Wigand reminded that it is not within the Commission’s remit to judge the constitutionality of national laws, a matter that lies with the member states themselves and their constitutional authorities. He underscored that the discussions at the European level are guided by principles of subsidiarity and mutual respect for national legal orders, especially when reforms touch the balance between legislative power and judicial oversight.
As the situation evolves, observers keep an eye on how the reforms align with democratic standards and what this means for the system of checks and balances in Spain. The dialogue between Madrid and Brussels continues with a focus on upholding constitutional integrity while allowing for reforms that can streamline governance. The Commission reiterates its position that it will assess the impact of any changes through established legal and governance channels, rather than through ad hoc judgments about specific laws. In this context, both supporters and critics of the reforms seek clarity on the implications for judicial independence, the selection process for high court judges, and the mechanisms that safeguard the rule of law in a changing political landscape. The overarching aim remains to preserve democratic health across all member states while supporting constitutional processes that reflect the will of the people and the necessities of modern governance.