Conversations between the pilots of the plane that landed in a field in the Novosibirsk region were published – the recording was published by the Telegram channel »112“
Judging by the conversations, the pilots informed the dispatcher about the problems in the aircraft’s hydraulic system. The controller advised the pilots to make an emergency landing in Novosibirsk, for which a separate flight was allocated.
The pilots later reported that they could not control the aircraft’s nose landing gear due to hydraulic problems.
In response, the dispatcher said, “1383 Your control post is azimuth 165, 146 kilometers from headquarters… and Novosibirsk control is operating at 132 point 5,” and then wished the pilots good luck.
Earlier, the Airbus A320 aircraft of Ural Airlines, which had previously raised the alarm, had landed outside the airport in the Novosibirsk region – the plane had landed in a field near the village of Kamenka.
The Main Directorate of the Ministry of Emergencies of the Novosibirsk Region announced that there were 167 people on the plane that made an emergency landing, including 6 crew members and 23 children.
Previously Russian aircraft become birds crash more often.
In this incident, preliminary communications captured the tense moment when the crew assessed hydraulic system failures and the need for a rapid, controlled landing away from populated areas. The dispatcher coordinated with air traffic control to reroute the flight to a safe, unoccupied field near Novosibirsk, highlighting the importance of clear, concise exchange between pilots and ground services during an in-flight emergency. These dialogues, released by the Telegram channel 112, provide a rare window into the decisions that accompany such high-stakes landings and the calm, procedural response that follows in the cockpit and on the ground, as reported by aviation observers and emergency responders who monitored the event.
During the approach, crews communicated their inability to deploy the nose gear due to hydraulic issues, a problem that increases the complexity of a field landing. The operational notes from the control tower referenced the distance to headquarters and the active status of local control facilities, underscoring the coordinated effort required to ensure a safe outcome for the 167 people aboard, including six crew members and 23 children who were accounted for after the landing. Safety teams conducted post-landing checks and prepared for potential injuries while ensuring that passengers remained calm and organized in the field environment. The incident has prompted authorities to review hydraulic system fault management protocols and to assess the readiness of alternate landing sites for situations where airports are not immediately available.
As the investigation continues, aviation officials emphasize that field landings, though uncommon, are a critical tool in preserving lives when standard airport options are compromised. The lessons from this event reinforce the value of timely dispatcher guidance, reliable air traffic coordination, and rigorous crew training in emergency procedures. This sequence of events—aircraft in distress, rapid decision-making, controlled descent, and orderly passenger management—exemplifies the layered response that often distinguishes a near-miss from a disaster in modern air travel. The community and families connected to the 167 people aboard can expect ongoing updates as investigators compile data from flight recorders, control tower transcripts, and maintenance logs, with results published through official channels and aviation oversight bodies.