The incident involving an Airbus A320 operated by Ural Airlines, which made an urgent landing in a field near Novosibirsk, has been the subject of official confirmations about fuel and technical conditions. Information cited by TASS reflects a statement from the regional authority overseeing transport matters, clarifying that the fuel status and related liquids observed at the scene were within permissible limits and did not indicate any unsafe anomaly at the time of the emergency landing.
From the results of examinations conducted at the site on September 12, 2023, investigators concluded that the fuel and technical liquids recovered during the onsite inspection complied with the required specifications. The Investigative Committee of Russia reported these conclusions, emphasizing that the findings did not reveal any deviations that would threaten passenger safety or aircraft integrity.
Authorities further noted that no charges were filed against the pilots. Instead, the pilots were present as witnesses in the incident, contributing information to the ongoing inquiry. This approach aligns with standard investigative procedures that prioritize fact gathering and assessment of flight crew actions based on their testimonies and the available data from the aircraft’s systems.
Earlier, the Federal Air Transport Agency had reopened the inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the landing in a wheat field. The case has involved multiple agencies reviewing flight data, maintenance records, and operational decisions to determine contributing factors and lessons for future safety improvements.
On September 12, the Ural Airlines Airbus A320 made an emergency landing in a field within the Ubinsky District of the Novosibirsk Region. The aircraft carried 161 people on board, including 23 children. Passengers praised the professionalism and composure of the flight crew, and Ural Airlines publicly commended the crew’s actions during the crisis. Some observers, however, expressed skepticism about certain pilot decisions when discussing the incident on social media, reflecting a broader public interest in how such emergencies are managed and communicated.
Earlier reports had identified a range of factors related to the incident, but authorities have consistently stressed that the core objective remains passenger safety and swift aeronautical decision-making. The ongoing investigation continues to assess all available evidence, including flight data records, maintenance history, and the crew’s adherence to established safety procedures, to determine whether any systemic insights can be drawn to prevent similar events in the future. The emphasis remains on transparent, evidence-based assessment of what occurred and how the response was executed under challenging conditions.