Armed clashes and official statements mark ongoing tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan
Recent reports describe exchanges of fire between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces along disputed sections of the border, with several incidents affecting areas in Gegharkunik and surrounding regions. Armenian defense authorities issued statements noting the use of small arms by Azerbaijani units against Armenian positions in Verin Shorzha within Gegharkunik. The Armenian Ministry of Defense identified the date and time of the incident as September 12, with the report specifying that the Azerbaijani armed forces opened fire on Armenian positions around 14.35 local time (13.45 Moscow time). (Attribution: Armenian Ministry of Defense)
Earlier, on September 1, Azerbaijani officials claimed that Armenian forces targeted Azerbaijani positions near Kalbajar. The Azerbaijani Ministry asserted that Yerevan sought to influence international public opinion by presenting a disputed perspective on the border situation and accused Armenia of provoking tensions. Responsibility for the deterioration of security conditions was said to rest with Armenia. (Attribution: Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense)
In a separate development, Armenian authorities accused Azerbaijan of strikes on facilities near Syunik airport in the city of Kapan. Reports indicated that two bullets damaged a window and the roof of the airport facility, underscoring the fragile security environment in border areas. (Attribution: Armenian National Security Service)
On August 16, statements from the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense described an incident in which an Armenian sabotage and reconnaissance group allegedly attempted to cross into Azerbaijani territory with the aim of carrying out sabotage operations. The release emphasized the prevention of the incursion and framed it as a defensive measure. (Attribution: Azerbaijani Ministry of Defense)
Earlier efforts between Armenia and Azerbaijan involved discussions about mutual recognition of territorial integrity, reflecting broader negotiations and diplomatic engagement that have characterized the long‑running conflict. The parties have periodically indicated willingness to engage on security and border arrangements, though concrete agreements have remained elusive. (Attribution: official statements from involved parties)