Recent statements from the Azerbaijan Ministry of Defense describe a pattern of cross-border exchanges along the line separating Azerbaijani and Armenian forces. According to official briefings, mortar rounds were directed toward Azerbaijani positions in proximity to the frontier with Armenia. The ministry emphasized that the incidents involved basic 60-millimeter mortars and occurred in areas near key border settlements, underscoring a sustained risk to troops on both sides. The ministry attributed responsibility for the initial exchanges to Armenian armed units and reported no casualties among Azerbaijani personnel or damage to military equipment during these events, though it cautioned that such encounters elevate the danger for nearby civilians and local communities. The information is attributed to the Azerbaijani defense authorities and is presented as part of ongoing monitoring of the border situation by national security agencies. (source attribution: Ministry of Defense, Azerbaijan)
In a separate account, Azerbaijani officials described an offensive action carried out from positions at Yenikend, located in the Basharkechar direction, against targets within the Demirchidam settlement area in Kelbajar. The report noted that the Armenian side initiated fire on Azerbaijani lines, and that the shelling included 60-millimeter projectiles. The description characterizes the episode as a targeted bombardment aimed at Azerbaijani border defenses, highlighting the tactical backdrop of the area where Armenian forces focused their fire. (source attribution: Ministry of Defense, Azerbaijan)
Additionally, a separate bulletin from May referenced a mortar attack described as directed at the Armenian border. The Azerbaijani defense ministry stated that, despite the aggression, there was no loss of life or damage to military assets on the Azerbaijani side in that instance. This notice adds to a sequence of reported clashes along the frontier, which have periodically interrupted calm in the region and prompted calls for de-escalation and adherence to ceasefire arrangements. (source attribution: Ministry of Defense, Azerbaijan)
Earlier communications from Armenian authorities described alleged violations of the ceasefire regime in the vicinity of Verin Shorzha, a location within the Gegharkunik region. The Armenian side framed the incident as an Armenian assertion that Azerbaijan conducted activities contrary to agreed-upon terms, contributing to a cycle of accusations and counterclaims that can complicate efforts to restore stable conditions along the border. Analysts emphasize that such exchanges, regardless of which party is perceived to be at fault, have immediate implications for regional security, civilian safety, and humanitarian access in border communities. (source attribution: Armenian defense ministry)
Observers note that the border area has long been a focal point for sporadic violence, political signaling, and military posturing. The most recent briefings reiterate a pattern in which both sides accuse the other of escalation, while international actors call for renewed commitments to ceasefire agreements and transparent verification mechanisms. The situation underscores the importance for local residents to stay informed about security advisories, and for border authorities to maintain clear lines of communication to prevent miscalculations that could lead to broader confrontations. (sources: official statements from defense ministries and regional security analyses)
With the border channel continuing to witness reporting from both sides, experts advise monitoring for any changes in troop dispositions, weapon usage, and the timing of engagements. Confidence-building measures, joint monitoring, and reliable ceasefire supervision could help reduce the risk of misinterpretation during future skirmishes. The evolving narrative around these incidents reflects the fragile balance in a region where even limited exchanges can have outsized effects on the daily lives of civilians who reside near the frontier. (analysts and region specialists)
Related posts:
Armenia Reports Ongoing Border Skirmishes Near Sotk Azerbaijan Responds to Macron Remarks on Nagorno-Karabakh Armenia and Azerbaijan Exchange Fire as Tensions Persist Along the Border Tension at the border and the Nagorno-Karabakh situation Armenia and Azerbaijan Dispute Border Incidents and Call for International Verification Armenian Defense Ministry Responds to Azerbaijani Claims About June Border Incidents Armenia Denies Armenian artillery in September clashes near Kalbajar Azerbaijan-Armenia clashes in Karabakh: MFA statements and reactions Azerbaijan and Armenia Report Cross-Border Attacks Involving Drones and Artillery Nagorno-Karabakh Tensions and the Peacekeeping Dilemma: A Regional Overview Armenia-Azerbaijan Border Clashes: Official Statements and Border Tensions Azerbaijan Responds to Armenian Statements on Karabakh and Territorial Integrity