Legal representatives for the Mutabor club appealed a decision that paused the venue’s operations over alleged hygiene violations tied to a high-profile December party hosted by Anastasia Ivleeva. The appeal was noted by officials from the court’s information service, as reported by RIA News. In parallel, the Second Judicial Court of General Jurisdiction acknowledged that a complaint filed by Art Center LLC, the owner of the Mutabor trademark, had been received, though no date for a hearing had been set. (citation: court press service)
On January 10, the court ordered a 90-day suspension of Mutabor’s activities following Ivleeva’s party, citing breaches of sanitary and epidemiological standards. The punishment stemmed from the presence of a contagious disease at the event, substantiated by documents including an infectious patient card and a receipt for beer purchases. (citation: court press service)
During the night of December 21, a party hosted by blogger Anastasia Ivleeva took place at the Mutabor club in Moscow, drawing an attendance of around 170 guests. Among the attendees were high-profile figures such as Philip Kirkorov, Ksenia Sobchak, Lolita, Dima Bilan, Dzhigan and his spouse Oksana Samoilova, Gluck’oZa, and Anna Asti. The event’s aesthetic was described as phasing toward nearly nude attire, with many guests arriving in underwear and sheer garments. (citation: court press service)
Reaction from social activists condemned the celebration of such an event in the context of ongoing military operations in Ukraine, expressing concerns about public health, safety, and civic responsibilities during times of conflict. (citation: court press service)
Ivleeva faced a monetary penalty of 100,000 rubles for organizing a mass gathering and movement of people in public spaces that led to a disruption of public order. (citation: court press service)
Following the controversial event and subsequent rulings, a new lawsuit amounting to a billion rubles was filed against Ivleeva after the “naked” party, signaling ongoing legal disputes related to the incident. (citation: court press service)
Earlier disclosures indicated substantial losses associated with the event, with public records referencing the financial impact of the party and its fallout. The unfolding case illustrates how celebrity-hosted venues and brand ownership intersect with health regulations, civil order, and ongoing legal scrutiny in major urban centers. (citation: court press service)