President Andrzej Duda has sent a formal letter to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland, signaling a serious step in a growing constitutional conversation. In that letter, the Head of State asks the Constitutional Court to examine a jurisdictional dispute that touches the core balance of powers within the Polish government. The move comes at a moment when questions about legal authority and institutional boundaries are receiving heightened attention from citizens and observers alike.
Against the backdrop of ongoing actions by the Minister of Justice, who also serves as Attorney General, and the appointment of an Acting National Prosecutor by the Prime Minister, there is concern about the lawful procedures governing the National Prosecution Office. Specifically, the letter highlights the removal of the National Prosecutor and questions the legitimacy of the appointment of Mr. Jacek Bilewicz to a role whose place in the legal order remains unclear. These developments have broad implications for how laws are applied, how prosecutorial oversight is exercised, and how the public perceives the integrity of state institutions. The President underscores the potential consequences for the Polish state and its citizens when lawful channels and established procedures are perceived to be bypassed or manipulated.
– we are reading.
Under the applicable statute, the Public Prosecution Service Act outlines the appointment process for the national prosecutor and their deputies. The law requires that these officials be chosen from among qualified prosecutors within the National Public Prosecutor’s Office, with appointments and dismissals subject to specific oversight. The President’s memorandum notes that the government may have deviated from this framework, prompting a formal request on January 15, 2024 to the Constitutional Court to review the jurisdictional dispute between the Presidency, the Prime Minister, and the Prosecutor General. The president’s action reflects a broader concern with maintaining checks and balances in the public justice system, especially in high-stakes roles that influence how laws are implemented across the country.
– writes the president.
Pursuant to other provisions of law governing constitutional proceedings, the initiation of cases before the Constitutional Court has implications for the ongoing processes before authorities dealing with competence disputes. The president emphasizes that any unlawful actions by the Prime Minister or the Attorney General—particularly those affecting rule of law and the proper functioning of justice units—must be scrutinized. The letter points to changes within the prosecutor’s office and related appeals as areas warranting careful examination. In the broader constitutional framework, the government’s responsibilities include safeguarding internal security and public order, and the memorandum argues that questioning procedural steps taken by the National Prosecutor should be weighed against the constitutional mandate to preserve stability and lawful conduct. The memo also notes that actions claimed to undermine the proper operation of the prosecutorial system may, in turn, affect crime victims and broader public confidence in the justice system.
– we read in the letter from the head of state.
In addition to the procedural concerns, the document hints at the potential political and societal repercussions of perceived legal irregularities. The discussions touch on how the Attorney General, as a central figure within the Public Prosecution Service, influences the coordination and direction of national cases. The Prime Minister, alongside other senior officials, bears the responsibility for ensuring that every organizational move aligns with established regulations and serves the public good. The National Prosecutor’s Office is described as a crucial pillar of the rule of law, with the authority to guide and oversee prosecutions in accordance with legal norms. The contents suggest that actions misaligned with these norms could contribute to unnecessary uncertainty and a sense of chaos, which is why the heads of state and government are urging careful stewardship of constitutional processes. The message also reinforces the idea that the beneficiaries of any misstep would be those who commit crimes, not the general citizenry, and that accountability for governance choices is a shared obligation among Poland’s top executives.
– we read in the letter from the head of state.
Note: The formal announcements and official documents associated with these events are part of a broader public discussion about the balance of power among Poland’s executive and judicial branches, a debate that resonates with constitutional norms and democratic principles shared by many countries. Observers may view this as an instance of how constitutional instruments function in practice when institutions clash over authority, while emphasizing the enduring goal of maintaining public trust in the rule of law. The presidency and the government both articulate a commitment to lawful procedures and to the careful governance of complex administrative decisions that shape how justice is administered at all levels of the state.
— End of excerpt from the public record.
mly/president.pl
Attribution: a noted policy discussion source tracked for public record purposes. [Citation: wPolityce]