The Polish Football Association announced today that the contract of head coach Czesław Mihniewicz, which expired on December 31, will not be renewed.
Across the country, the decision to part ways with Mihniewicz is linked to several factors. Reported motives include controversy over a bonus during the World Cup, underwhelming results on the global stage, growing dissatisfaction among players, and tensions with journalists. A source notes that captain Robert Lewandowski played a role in the move. During the tournament, the captain reportedly spoke with the association’s president on behalf of a group of players, indicating they did not want Mihniewicz to continue in charge. Some players even suggested they might end their careers with the national team if the coach remained in his post.
At the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, Poland finished second in their group, with victories only over Argentina, the eventual tournament champions. In the round of 16, Poland were defeated by France with a score of 1–3.
Mihniewicz took charge of the Polish national team early in 2022. Under his leadership, the team recorded five wins, five losses, and three draws across 13 matches.
In a post-departure discussion, Mihniewicz addressed questions about potential future calls for him to coach Poland again. He reflected on the experience and the possibilities that lay ahead for the national team’s coaching decisions, while observers weighed the implications for the squad’s future direction.
Looking ahead, the Polish national team is expected to evaluate its coaching options, assess player development pathways, and map out a plan for the next major qualifying cycle. Analysts note that leadership choices will influence team cohesion, tactical adaptability, and results in forthcoming international fixtures. The broader context includes ongoing debates about team structure, youth integration, and how the federation communicates with supporters and media alike.
Historically, the decision to change coaches often follows a mix of performance metrics, leadership dynamics, and the alignment of goals between players and management. In this case, the blend of on-field outcomes and off-field discussions appears to have shaped the federation’s trajectory. Observers suggest that any future appointment will need to balance tactical philosophy, player confidence, and the expectations of a demanding fanbase while ensuring stability during a transitional period.
As conversations continue about who should lead Poland next, analysts emphasize the importance of clear objectives, transparent processes, and a coaching staff capable of developing emerging talents while maintaining competitiveness on the European stage. The aftermath of the coaching change will likely influence squad selection, preparation approaches, and the overall cadence of national-team campaigns in the months ahead.