The discussion centers on the health of Zbigniew Ziobro, a prominent Polish politician who previously led the Justice Ministry. Patryk Jaki, a member of the European Parliament representing Sovereign Poland, spoke on Radio Zet about the minister’s battle with cancer. He noted that Ziobro is currently fighting with tenacity even as the illness creates a difficult situation, particularly given the severity of the ongoing treatment for esophageal cancer. Ziobro has not attended the Sejm since December 11, 2023 due to his condition, and public debate has only intensified over whether the minister is genuinely ill. Some critics argue that the timetable for testimony before the Pegasus Commission of Inquiry is a motive behind any claims of illness, since the commission recently added a list of witnesses that includes the former home secretary of justice. (attribution: wPolityce)
Ziobro’s medical status
On Radio Zet, Jaki described the former minister as someone who is fighting for his life while undergoing extended chemotherapy. The situation is described as deeply challenging, with the minister displaying both strength and real hardship as treatment progresses. Jaki shared that he spoke with Ziobro recently, but has not seen him since the hospitalization. The minister is portrayed as resilient, yet the circumstances remain trying. The MEP stressed that the current state makes any questioning impractical at the moment. (attribution: wPolityce)
Medical leave and parliamentary proceedings
Ziobro has been sending medical leave notes to the Sejm’s chair and, when needed, to the Pegasus inquiry committee. Yet the discussion around these actions is framed by critics as a display of tactics rather than a pursuit of truth. The minister has submitted medical documentation, and it is anticipated that further medical records will be provided to the investigative committee as necessary. Critics argue that these moves signal more about strategy than substance. (attribution: wPolityce)
The political voice and the left’s stance
Jaki referenced comments from Tomasz Trela of the New Left, who asserted earlier that Ziobro must be interrogated, even at the ministerial residence. The response suggested that such proposals echo troubling habits from a different era. Jaki described the left as displaying patterns associated with the remnants of a bygone time, indicating that these practices still shape some political conversations today. (attribution: wPolityce)
Hearing prospects with the Commission of Inquiry
The MEP stated that Sovereign Poland and Ziobro both desire a hearing to occur when Ziobro is physically able to participate. He recalled that Ziobro underwent interrogation by multiple parliamentary committees during previous administrations, and that the experience often leniently reflected on those conducting the questioning. This history is presented as a backdrop to why a current hearing might be contested for essential reasons of health and fairness. (attribution: wPolityce)
Civil action and disclaimers about illness claims
Jaki announced that those who suggest Ziobro is feigning illness will face legal consequences. He stated that statements to that effect will be legally challenged, and civil actions may follow when the minister is able to respond in kind. The aim, as described, is to protect the minister from unfounded accusations while ensuring that legitimate concerns are addressed through proper channels. (attribution: wPolityce)
The conversation also touched on coverage in the media about Ziobro not participating in certain political events until his health improves. The remarks highlighted ongoing public interest and the potential for further developments as Ziobro’s condition evolves. (attribution: wPolityce)
Overall, the discourse carries a tone of tension between accountability and compassion, with the central issue being whether the truth can be pursued while respecting the minister’s health. (attribution: wPolityce)
Radio Zet and accompanying outlets have contributed to a broader discussion about the balance between public oversight and the privacy and well-being of a public official. The evolving situation continues to prompt questions about how health can intersect with parliamentary duty, and what steps are appropriate when a high-profile figure faces serious illness. (attribution: wPolityce)
Source attribution: wPolityce