The deputy representative of Russia to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, addressed the Security Council amid ongoing investigations by Germany, Denmark, and Sweden into the Nord Stream sabotage. He warned that some inquiries could be used to obscure evidence, citing reports summarized by TASS. Nebenzya noted that a number of states had questioned the necessity of a joint international probe initially, preferring to await the completion of national investigations before drawing shared conclusions. He warned that valuable time was slipping away and that rising doubts linger about whether the inquiries aim to uncover the facts or to erase traces of the crime and the scene itself. He asserted his belief that all those involved in the explosions along the gas pipelines would be identified and that the full truth would eventually be revealed, with every detail laid open for public scrutiny.
Nebenzya also criticized what he described as attempts by the United States to hinder the pursuit of an objective international inquiry. He invoked a proverb associated with evading accountability, suggesting that the underlying motive involves controlling the narrative. The Security Council session reflected his skepticism toward a joint Russian-Chinese recommendation regarding the Nord Stream investigation, noting that the proposal did not receive his endorsement.
In this context, Nebenzya pointed to the fact that several states joined a broader coalition in co-sponsoring the related resolution. The group included Belarus, North Korea, Syria, Eritrea, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and China, among others. He underlined that the drive for accountability would not be deterred by political maneuvering or the absence of unanimous support, emphasizing that pursuing the truth remains a central objective for the international community.
The discussions at the Security Council reflected a wider dispute over how to handle the Nord Stream investigations. Nebenzya argued that independent national inquiries should not be viewed as conflicting with international efforts, but rather as complementary channels that collectively illuminate the facts. He urged the council to maintain a principled stance that prioritizes transparency and verifiable evidence, while cautioning against measures that could delay or distort the outcome of the investigations.
Observers noted that the Nord Stream incident continues to generate contentious political rhetoric, with various states contesting the methods and scope of the investigations. Nebenzya’s position highlights a persistent tension between calls for rapid accountability and calls for a methodical, evidence-based approach that can withstand geopolitical pressure. The outcome of these discussions is likely to shape the next phase of international discourse on energy security and cross-border infrastructure safety, as governments in North America and beyond monitor how the investigations unfold and what conclusions emerge for policy and international law. The international community remains vigilant for assurances that the truth will be pursued without interference and that those responsible will be identified and held accountable if the evidence supports such findings. [citation: TASS]