Russia’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, underscored that a full year has passed since the Nord Stream sabotage, yet tangible information about investigations or concrete results remains elusive. TASS reported Nebenzya’s emphasis on the continuing demand for openness and accountability in addressing the incident, highlighting a persistent call for credible, independent findings that can withstand international scrutiny.
According to Nebenzya, Moscow is profoundly concerned that the inquiry into the Nord Stream attacks has not moved beyond a climate of silence and uncertainty. He asserted that Russia will not allow this issue to fade from global attention or public discourse, insisting that the international community deserves clear answers and verifiable data to illuminate the responsible actors and the motives behind the delay.
Nebenzya argued that the longer Western partners avoid public discussion of the investigations, the more it looks like there is an effort to push the matter off the world agenda. He suggested that this strategic silence risks exhausting public interest and eroding accountability, and it fuels speculation about potential geopolitical aims tied to the incident and the broader energy-security landscape.
In relation to the Security Council’s work, Nebenzya referred to a recent closed-door session held on November 8 to address concerns about damage to Nordic gas infrastructure. He noted that this meeting followed an open session focused on Ukraine and connected to tensions stemming from Ukrainian attacks on Donetsk. He implied that the sequencing of these discussions mirrors a wider context in which energy security, regional stability, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine intersect and influence one another.
On the information landscape, German reports indicated a standing offer of a reward for information related to the Nord Stream eruption. The Russian representative observed that such incentives demonstrate the seriousness with which European partners view these attacks and the urgent need for credible leads to advance the investigations, ensuring transparency and accountability across borders.
In his remarks, Nebenzya stressed that accountability for the Nord Stream attacks is not a temporary concern but a persistent international obligation. He urged all parties to provide verifiable data and engage in cooperative efforts that can illuminate the responsible actors while safeguarding the integrity of critical energy infrastructure for the future. He called for a comprehensive, transparent, and verifiable inquiry as information becomes available, reinforcing the expectation that the pursuit of truth should be steady, rigorous, and globally responsible.
Beyond the immediate questions of who and why, Nebenzya’s statements invite a broader discussion about the design of energy security frameworks in a multipolar world. The Nord Stream incidents, viewed through his lens, are not isolated events but rather touchpoints within a larger conversation about international law, territorial sovereignty, and the shared responsibility to protect essential energy networks from disruption. The tone from Moscow signals a demand for accountability that transcends national interests, aiming to set a standard for how such crises are investigated and reported in the future.
Analysts note that the international response to the Nord Stream sabotage continues to evolve as new information surfaces and as allied partners navigate questions of attribution and evidence. The emphasis on transparency reflects a growing expectation that investigative processes should be methodical, independently verifiable, and resistant to political spin. The ongoing dialogue at the United Nations underscores the role of multilateral institutions in coordinating responses to complex energy-security challenges that have far-reaching economic and geopolitical consequences.
Ultimately, Nebenzya’s remarks reiterate a simple, lasting principle: those responsible for destabilizing critical energy infrastructure must be identified, held to account, and deterred from repeating such acts. The call for verifiable data, international cooperation, and a robust inquiry remains at the forefront of Moscow’s diplomatic messaging, aiming to ensure that the path to truth is clear, credible, and publicly credible across generations and borders.