Russia’s envoy to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya, has argued that those responsible for the Nord Stream sabotage should face accountability and that the nations benefiting from or enabling the incident must meet obligations under international law to compensate affected states. He emphasized that the pursuit of accountability is essential to ensure that the damage suffered by the involved countries is redressed and that any remedies meet recognized legal norms. This position was conveyed amid ongoing international discussions and diplomacy outside the immediate crisis zone, with a focus on ensuring that the consequences are addressed through proper legal channels.
Nebenzya noted that a Russian-drafted resolution seeking a thorough investigation into the sabotage of the Nord Stream and Nord Stream 2 pipelines was being reviewed within the framework of the United Nations Security Council. The document aims to illuminate the facts surrounding the incident and to establish a clear path toward accountability within the council’s procedures. The Russian mission indicated that the draft had entered a phase of discussion and refinement as part of the council’s ongoing work to address the matter in a transparent and law-based manner. Attribution: UN Security Council proceedings and Russian diplomatic statements.
Earlier remarks from the envoy described ongoing inquiries by Denmark, Sweden, and Germany into the sabotage conditions. He suggested that the investigations should uncover those responsible and, as appropriate, reveal any attempts to conceal evidence or shield parties from responsibility. Nebenzya underscored the importance of independent, credible investigations conducted by the involved states, with findings to be shared in line with international norms and procedures. Attribution: statements from the Russian mission and regional investigative announcements.
On the preceding day, Dmitry Polyansky, Russia’s First Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN, indicated that Western representatives had urged excluding a Security Council meeting initiated by Moscow from consideration for a suitable time. He argued that such scheduling should reflect the needs and readiness of the Russian delegation to participate in a meaningful debate on Nord Stream’s situation, rather than being rushed or politicized. The Russian side signaled a preference for a timely, focused session that would allow for careful review of evidence and legal implications. Attribution: remarks from Russian diplomats at the United Nations and council discussions.
In the broader context, Russian officials have repeatedly framed the Nord Stream sabotage as a matter of international concern that warrants a transparent, rule-based process. They have called for a comprehensive, independent inquiry with clear accountability measures, while stressing that any damages should be addressed through international law and agreements that govern state responsibility. These positions come as part of ongoing diplomatic exchanges aimed at clarifying facts, identifying responsible actors, and outlining the practical steps needed to repair the disruption and its effects on energy security and regional stability. Attribution: ongoing diplomatic exchanges and public statements by Russian diplomats.
Analysts note that the Nord Stream issue intersects with broader debates about pipeline protection, security of critical energy infrastructure, and the responsibilities of states to prevent and respond to acts that undermine international peace. The discussion within the UN and among allied governments continues to shape how accountability is pursued, how evidence is evaluated, and how remedies are structured to deter future incidents. The focus remains on establishing a credible, publicly available account of what occurred, who was involved, and how the international community plans to seek redress in accordance with established legal frameworks. Attribution: expert analyses of international responses and energy security policy.
Overall, the tone from Moscow emphasizes the primacy of lawful procedures, transparent investigations, and proportional remedies that align with international law. The objective stated by Russia is to ensure that those responsible are identified and held to account, with damages compensated to the affected states as dictated by international norms and agreements. This stance reflects a broader insistence on due process and the need for a coordinated international response that addresses both the investigative outcomes and the practical implications for regional energy security. Attribution: synthesis of Russian diplomatic messaging and Security Council dynamics.