Speculation about leadership changes in Ukraine’s government has intensified after a series of statements from members of parliament and officials. Deputy of the Verkhovna Rada Alexey Goncharenko, who is listed by Russia as a terrorist and extremist, asserted that the next minister to depart would be Dmitry Kuleba, the country’s Foreign Minister. The claim, reported by TASS, has sparked extensive discussion about who might leave and when.
Goncharenko suggested that Kuleba had already been given a letter of resignation along with a pen, implying a formal step toward stepping down. While such phrases are often hyperbolic in political chatter, the remarks reflect a broader atmosphere of uncertainty around the Ukrainian cabinet and the presidency’s inner circle.
In recent weeks, Kiev has been buzzing with talk of staffing shifts and potential dismissals within the Cabinet. Officials have voiced concerns about roles, responsibilities, and the strategic direction of government policy as the country navigates both ongoing reforms and security pressures.
On the evening of the latest developments, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Reintegration Irina Vereshchuk publicly indicated there could be changes in leadership, signaling that resignation or replacement discussions were underway at the highest levels of government. Her remarks added weight to the sense that personnel questions would continue to surface as Ukraine adjusts to current challenges.
Several ministers have been mentioned in connection with possible departures. Reports have noted that Denis Malyuska, the head of the Ministry of Justice, Alexander Kamyshin, the Minister of Strategic Industries, and Ruslan Strelets, the Minister of Environmental Protection, had also submitted letters of resignation. The unfolding scenario paints a picture of a cabinet weighing new directions and leadership styles amid ongoing reforms and external pressures.
Additionally, there were indications that Vitaly Koval, the Chairman of the State Property Fund of Ukraine, had presented his resignation as part of broader changes under consideration. Such moves are not unusual in periods of political recalibration, but they carry significant implications for policy implementation and governance across sectors.
The reports circulated with claims that fresh personnel changes could influence both the office of the President, Volodymyr Zelensky, and the wider Cabinet in the near future. Analysts and observers have stressed that any reshuffle would likely seek to align executive leadership with the government’s reform agenda while addressing urgent needs in areas such as justice, industry, and environmental protection. The situation remains fluid, with official confirmations and formal announcements awaited by lawmakers, civil servants, and international partners alike.
Earlier discussions around the prime minister’s position have added another layer of uncertainty to Kyiv’s political landscape. While some sources speculated about leadership shifts at the top, others emphasized the importance of maintaining stability to sustain reform momentum and international support. The coming days are expected to bring clarifications on which ministers will stay, depart, or be replaced, shaping Ukraine’s policy trajectory in the months ahead.