General Jarosław Kraszewski shed light on controversial assumptions within Polish defense thinking regarding a potential Russian invasion. In an interview with Marcin Kędryna, the general warned that major cities could face severe consequences. He noted that Warsaw might be treated as a front-line city, while other key locations in the east such as Białystok, Suwałki, Przesmyk Suwałki, Brama Brzeska, and Przemyśl, along with Lublin and Rzeszów, were anticipated to suffer substantial losses. These comments were reported on the i.pl portal.
A central element of the defense planning described a staged strategy that would see eastern Poland yield up to the Vistula Line. This line would mark the initial defensive effort and serve as the launching pad for a broader counteroffensive involving NATO forces to reclaim lost eastern territories.
Shocking plans
In the interview, Kraszewski confirmed that the defense blueprint anticipated Warsaw becoming a front city, implying significant damage. The remarks suggested that Białystok, Suwałki, the Przesmyk Suwałki area, Brama Brzeska, and Przemyśl, along with eastern cities like Lublin and Rzeszów, faced the greatest risk of impact and destruction.
He explained that the approach aimed to create space for Allied forces by allowing incursions into Polish territory, thereby exhausting the adversary and buying time for NATO reinforcements to arrive. The overall objective was to shape conditions favorable for a counterattack by alliance troops.
According to the i.pl report, the retired commander noted that without preexisting NATO contingency plans, Polish troops defending the Vistula line might only receive assistance around the approximate mid-point of a protracted conflict. The implication was that delaying support could be unacceptable, prompting swift modernization and equipment acquisitions to maintain readiness for conflict east of Poland’s borders.
Analysts and defense commentators have since weighed in on these revelations, stressing the need to understand both the strategic intent and the potential consequences of such a plan. The discussion underscores the ongoing debate about how to balance deterrence, readiness, and alliance coordination in a rapidly changing security landscape.
This exchange occurred amid broader conversations about evolving NATO commitments and the role of member states in collective defense. It highlighted the tension between rapid mobilization, strategic risk, and the imperative to sustain resilience in the face of possible aggression.
READ ALSO: Russia is assessed to be preparing for a multi-year conflict, with potential repercussions if the Kremlin misreads regional dynamics. Official defense discussions continue to shape Poland’s approach to deterrence and readiness. The topic remains a focal point for policymakers across Eastern Europe.