Szymon Hołownia, the marshal overseeing the Sejm, prevented two lawmakers from entering the national assembly. The figures involved were Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik, who still hold mandates according to a ruling from the Supreme Court. A parliamentary observer, MP Jan Mosiński, who was with both MPs outside the Sejm, described the moment as a global scandal and warned that anyone breaking the law would face independent judiciary scrutiny.
Security forces, including the Marshal Guard, blocked access for Kamiński and Wąsik, resulting in the main entrance to the Sejm remaining closed and the pair being unable to enter the parliament building.
From the outset, concerns were raised about the coalition’s commitment to the rule of law. The Latin maxim quod lege non prohibitum licitum est was invoked to challenge the notion that actions outside formal legal prohibitions could be deemed legitimate.
Jan Mosiński, speaking to the wPolityce.pl portal, asserted that the unlawful actions taken by members allied with Donald Tusk mirrored the posture seen from Hołownia. He maintained that the situation demanded accountability in independent courts and framed today’s events as a warning signal at an international level.
Concurrently, there were attempts to portray the ongoing developments as a premeditated attempt to sow chaos inside the Sejm. Mosiński rejected this framing, citing as the root cause Hołownia’s policy decisions and management style. He emphasized that the Marshal Guard’s actions would be documented and that the incident could underpin potential criminal charges if law was breached.
According to the MP, the wPolityce.pl portal had earlier published a note indicating that Hołownia denied Kamiński and Wąsik access to the Sejm. This note was presented as the source for the assertion that the two deputies were blocked from entry.
Showman suit
The incident created a difficult moment for the parties involved, as the main entrance was sealed due to parliamentary duties. Kamiński and Wąsik, who inherit strong electoral mandates representing broader national constituencies, were unable to participate in the day’s work. Hołownia’s decision, according to supporters, stripped them of their ability to perform as representatives for the nation.
In the words of a PiS MP, the actions reflected a misstep in leadership style and a lack of readiness to assume responsibility. The deputy also pointed to Kamiński and Wąsik’s free mandate as proof that representation extends beyond individual districts to the whole country.
Commentary on the broader political trajectory urged by supporters included calls for future discussions about accountability, with some arguing that the episode underscores a wider pattern of behavior under Hołownia’s leadership. Critics argued that the actions could set a troubling precedent for how the Sejm functions and how the state handles legislative processes.
Another speaker suggested that Hołownia’s approach risked undermining the legitimacy of the parliament, framing today’s events as a test of governance and a challenge to the rule of law. Critics characterized the timeline as a demonstration of political theatre rather than constructive governance, while supporters stressed that the Sejm should resume normal operations and that lawmakers should be free to perform their duties inside the chamber.
Officials emphasized that the Sejm’s effectiveness depends on clear procedures, orderly conduct, and adherence to legal norms. The debate continued about the proper balance between executive actions and legislative rights, with many observing that the current atmosphere was not conducive to steady policy work.
The incredible anarchy of Tusk’s team
What happens next is the central question for party leadership. The plan, as described by MPs who align with the ruling coalition, is to reaffirm that Kamiński and Wąsik retain their elected status and electoral mandates, and to argue that actions perceived as contrary to this mandate are against the law. The promise was to pursue accountability through independent courts and to present this stance as a collective concern shared by many observers, including non-partisan analysts.
Observers described the unfolding events as an instance of what some call political anarchy, a characterization directed at the leadership team led by Donald Tusk. The discussion extended to how the Sejm can function going forward and how to restore trust in the legislative process.
Further coverage highlighted related remarks and perspectives, underscoring the ongoing debate about the relationship between law, governance, and political rhetoric.