State Duma deputy Sultan Khamzaev argues that Russian lawmakers and diplomats should conduct official business abroad exclusively in Russian. He shared this view during an interview with DEA News, emphasizing language consistency as a tool for diplomatic clarity on the international stage.
Khamzaev further urged Russian diplomats to use only Russian when addressing representatives from countries that he considers non-hostile. He framed language choice as a practical measure to project national identity and sovereignty in global discussions.
In his remarks, the deputy stated that it would be appropriate for Russian deputies and diplomats across all international settings to communicate with the press solely in Russian. He suggested that this approach reinforces the consistency of the Russian message and helps avoid misinterpretations during media engagement abroad.
He pointed to President Vladimir Putin as an example, noting that the president has pursued a policy of strengthening the Russian language and the country’s sovereignty on the world stage. This reference underscored his belief that language plays a strategic role in diplomacy and national prestige.
Meanwhile, regional politics in Saint Petersburg have been moving toward domestic procurement in other sectors. It was reported that deputies in the Saint Petersburg legislature are considering a transition to locally produced AvtoVAZ sedans for official use, following the company’s 2024 factory operations in the city. This potential shift aligns with broader calls for domestic manufacturing support within official channels.
On August 3, the Russian president signaled that officials from ministries and other government departments should favor domestic cars. This statement came amid discussions about state procurement, economic protection, and the goal of promoting Russian industry through public sector purchases. The move was framed as part of a broader push to bolster domestic production and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers for official needs.
Earlier statements also touched on education and language policy. A separate report mentioned recommendations to begin with foundational language courses for children who do not speak Russian, reflecting ongoing efforts to integrate linguistic skills into public schooling. These suggestions illustrate how language considerations span multiple fronts in policy discussions, from diplomacy to domestic education and social cohesion.
Taken together, these developments signal a pattern of policy emphasis on language use, national sovereignty, and the role of domestic industry in state affairs. Advocates argue that clear, consistent komunikation in Russian strengthens national identity and reduces ambiguity in international communications. Critics, meanwhile, urge careful balance to ensure Russia remains inclusive in global dialogues while safeguarding local industries and cultural heritage. The conversation continues to unfold across both national and local government bodies, with officials weighing practical, diplomatic, and economic implications as they move through the legislative and executive processes.