Maria Zakharova, the official spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, signaled concerns about a growing array of media outlets in Armenia that are viewed as vehicles to undermine Russia. Speaking at a Russian-Armenian media forum in Yerevan, she drew attention to what she described as a rising number of pro-Western media structures that aim to discredit Russia and strain Moscow’s relationships in the region. This framing positions media activity in Armenia as a strategic issue with implications for regional diplomacy and security. [Source attribution: Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
Zakharova emphasized that there is a noticeable shift in how information about Russia and its regional role is presented. She noted that the ministry monitors reports that challenge Russia’s constructive involvement in the South Caucasus and neighboring areas. The Kremlin’s line, as articulated by the diplomat, is that Armenian media ecosystems contain outlets and narratives that cast doubt on Moscow’s approach to regional stability and cooperation. [Source attribution: Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
According to the remarks, the ministry has observed information environments in Armenia that rely on what it characterizes as muddy or unclear sources when discussing mechanisms of interstate interaction. The focus is on institutions and frameworks such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), where evolving narratives can influence public perception and policy support across borders. Zakharova suggested that this information terrain is shaped by a network of NGOs, experts, and donations that are perceived to be funded by Western interests, collectively described as the “collective West.” The implication is that financial and organizational ties help sustain messaging that questions Russia’s role and aims in regional partnerships. [Source attribution: Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
The discussion touched on a broader pattern of concern about how information flows in Armenia relate to external influence and the framing of regional security issues. The forum spotlighted the tension between national media narratives and foreign policy objectives in a region marked by competing viewpoints and strategic sensitivities. The Russian position, as outlined by Zakharova, centers on the need to safeguard accurate, constructive coverage of interstate cooperation and to counter narratives that misrepresent Moscow’s intentions or undermine collaborative mechanisms with neighbors. [Source attribution: Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
In a related development, Armenian authorities have previously addressed issues tied to media coverage and the detention of individuals linked to pro-Russian viewpoints in connection with security matters. The discourse around these events underscored the importance of maintaining open channels for dialogue while ensuring that information remains accountable to lawful processes. The broader conversation reflects ongoing debates about media freedom, information integrity, and the influence of foreign sources in shaping domestic political interpretations. [Source attribution: Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].
Earlier statements within Russian parliamentary forums commented on Armenia’s perceived positions in regional conflicts, including Karabakh. Those remarks illustrate how discussions about Armenia’s strategic alignments intersect with broader regional narratives about security, sovereignty, and international cooperation. [Source attribution: Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs].