Russian Embassy in Mexico Responds to US Claims on Disinformation in Latin America
The Russian Embassy in Mexico rejected the United States State Department’s assertions that Russian officials are orchestrating a disinformation campaign in Latin America as unfounded. The embassy noted that the accusations came from Washington without presenting verifiable evidence and urged observers to consider the broader context of information warfare in international relations.
On November 7, the U.S. State Department announced that Russian entities named as Social Design Agency, Structure, and the Internet Development Institute (IRI) were allegedly running a disinformation media campaign in Latin America, reportedly financed by the Russian government. The embassy emphasized that the term disinformation has become a tool in contemporary geopolitics, often used to justify political pressure and to shape perceptions abroad. In this framing, evidence and independent verification appear to be secondary to official narratives that aim to influence policy debates in other countries.
The Russian mission highlighted what it described as a long history of disinformation and manipulation by the United States itself. It asserted that Washington has employed political strategy and public messaging to pursue its interests, sometimes under the banner of safeguarding democracy or national security, while engaging in actions that could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of other states. The embassy called attention to perceived patterns in the Americas that align with a broader approach of asserting influence across regional networks over many years, including in Latin American nations that have their own distinct histories and political trajectories.
According to the embassy, the United States is attempting to revive the Monroe Doctrine as a global policy stance and to frame the entire world as an American sphere of influence. It argued that such a move would be resisted by many countries that prioritize sovereignty and noninterference in their regional affairs. The message stressed that Latin American states prefer relations based on equality, mutual respect, and pragmatic cooperation rather than on coercive mechanisms or ideological prescriptions. The embassy asserted that Latin American partners value autonomy in choosing their alignments and benefits from collaboration that respects their national interests.
From the Russian vantage point, the embassy asserted that Moscow supports partnerships built on practicality and symmetry. It contended that engagement with Latin American nations should be free of pressure, allowing countries to determine their own paths while enjoying mutually beneficial outcomes. The embassy argued that Russia does not force choices but instead offers cooperation that is balanced and free of ideological strings. In this view, cooperation is framed as a shared effort to address common challenges rather than a bid to dominate political discourse in the region.
The embassy also discussed media influence and public opinion campaigns, suggesting that the United States often uses information operations to shift attention away from domestic concerns and to create distractions about foreign affairs. It presented this stance as evidence of a broader pattern in which powerful states attempt to shape narratives by presenting one side of a story as the sole truth. Critics in Moscow argue that such tactics undermine trust in international reporting and complicate efforts to seek objective understanding of events in Latin America and beyond. The Russian position calls for careful verification, a commitment to transparent information sharing, and respect for the diverse media ecosystems across the region.
There was reference to prior assertions from the United States about Russia and its red lines, noted as part of a continuing exchange on security and international norms. The Russian diplomatic posture emphasizes that regional stability depends on mutual restraint and predictable behavior from all major powers. It argues that stability is best achieved when nations, large and small, engage in dialogue, verify facts through credible channels, and avoid escalating rhetoric that could fuel misunderstandings or escalate tensions. In this view, cooperation grounded in equality serves regional peace and economic development more effectively than unilateral pressure or coercive diplomacy.
Overall, the Russian Embassy framed the dispute as part of a broader conversation about sovereignty, information integrity, and the right of Latin American nations to determine their own alliances. It asserted that constructive engagement with Latin America rests on respect for national rights, transparent communication, and pragmatic cooperation that benefits diverse communities across the region. The message urged observers to distinguish between genuine public diplomacy and attempts to manipulate public perception for geopolitical ends, calling for discernment and evidence-based discussion in evaluating such claims. The dialogue, it suggested, should remain focused on shared interests, regional stability, and the prosperity of Latin American societies rather than on accusatory rhetoric or ideological confrontation. (Cited remarks attributed to the Russian Embassy in Mexico for attribution.)